These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5805710)
1. Letter to the editor: Reply to Strupp and Bergin; Psychotherapy. Frank JD Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Jun; 7(6):427. PubMed ID: 5805710 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Effectiveness of psychotherapy is amply demonstrated. Meltzoff J Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 5790800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Psychotherapeutic efficacy and objective research. Wolpe J Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 5790802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Traditional reductionism is unsatisfactory. Robbins LL Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 5790801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Research cannot yet influence clinical practice. Luborsky L Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 5790798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Domains and dilemmas. Goldstein AP Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 5790797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Empiricism is accepted. Marks IM Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 5790799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Common features account for effectiveness. Frank JD Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 5790796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Researchers are weeded out. Colby KM Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):116-21. PubMed ID: 5790795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical evaluation of Strupp and Bergin. Standard methods needed. Endicott NA Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):118-21. PubMed ID: 4892904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The deterioration effect: a reply to Bergin. Braucht GN J Abnorm Psychol; 1970 Jun; 75(3):293-9. PubMed ID: 5423020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The last word (?) on psychotherapy research: A reply. Bergin AE; Strupp HH Int J Psychiatry; 1969 Mar; 7(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 5790803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Consequences of psychotherapeutic research in recent years for general practice]. Heim E Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr; 1981; 128(2):211-26. PubMed ID: 7256217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The outcome problem in psychotherapy: a reply. Eysenck HJ Psychotherapy (Chic); 2013 Mar; 50(1):12-4; discussion 15. PubMed ID: 23505975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Letter to the editor: on the articles by Klimitz H. "Psychoeducation in schizophrenic disorders--psychotherapy or 'infiltration'?" and Bäuml J. "Psychoeducation from a psychiatric-psychotherapeutic point of view". Psychiat Prax 2006; 33: 372-382 ]. Böhme F Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Mar; 34(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 17390267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reply to letter by Green, Marsden and Fone (2007) about Sessa and Nutt's editorial (MDMA: baby with the bath water) in the November 2007 journal. Sessa B; Nutt D J Psychopharmacol; 2008 Jun; 22(4):457-8. PubMed ID: 18635726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating comparative studies of paraprofessional and professional helpers: a reply to Nietzel and Fisher. Durlak JA Psychol Bull; 1981 May; 89(3):566-9. PubMed ID: 7255630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]