These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5808864)

  • 1. Revalidation of the clinical test version of the modified rhyme words.
    Beyer MR; Webster JC; Dague DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Jun; 12(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 5808864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Modified Rhyme Test results from impaired- and normal-hearing listeners.
    Elkins EF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 5163893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the time-compressed modified rhyme test.
    Schwartz DM; Mikus B
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 893195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Directional audiometry. II. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech.
    Tonning FM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1971 Nov; 72(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 5146009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech discrimination in noise.
    Cooper JC; Cutts BP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 5558087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modified rhyme test and synthetic sentence identification test scores of normal and hearing-impaired subjects listening in multitalker noise.
    Miner R; Danhauer JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 977431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DRUG EFFECTS ON THE AUDITORY SPEECH DISCRIMINATION MECHANISMS: THE ACTION OF ATROPINE AND SCOPOLAMINE.
    ANTONELLI AR; CALEARO C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1964; 58():105-10. PubMed ID: 14210220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Galker test of speech reception in noise; associations with background variables, middle ear status, hearing, and language in Danish preschool children.
    Lauritsen MB; Söderström M; Kreiner S; Dørup J; Lous J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jan; 80():53-60. PubMed ID: 26746613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [SPEECH AUDIOMETRY IN CHILDREN].
    Albrecht R
    Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1967 Apr; 22(14):650-3. PubMed ID: 5584390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rationale and standardization for a combined speech articulation and auditory discrimination test.
    Hutchinson BB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):715-21. PubMed ID: 5127190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The nature of speech hearing tests; cochleovestibular audition and schizacousia].
    KOBRAK F
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1951 Sep; 30(9):391-8. PubMed ID: 14914026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Freiburg's speech understanding test and its apperception].
    Ackermann R
    HNO; 1969 Mar; 17(3):89-91. PubMed ID: 5405366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of masking on hearing acuity, on tone and speech of subjects working in conditions of industrial noise].
    ROMM SZ
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1962; 24():37-43. PubMed ID: 14493625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The Oldenburg children's rhyme test during speech simulating noise disturbance (Regensburg variant). Modification of the test and normal values for the ages 7-10 years].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 14647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory detection of spondaic words in wide-band noise by adults with normal hearing and by children with profound hearing losses.
    Erber NP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 5558093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Primary investigation of central auditory function in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy].
    Li L; Wang NY; Zhang H; Ge XH; Li JL; Xie Q; Xu XF; Liu B; Liu S; Hu WL; Li Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 42(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 18051564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.
    Carhart R; Tillman TW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar; 91(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 5414080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.