These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Lee and Lombard effects in determining the auditory selfcontrol of speech in children with hearing disorders]. Belov IM; Podgornykh AV; Shevchenko GF Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1975; (5):31-4. PubMed ID: 1231382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Electronic organization for hearing, voice and speech studies at the Graz University HNO Clinic]. Horwath T Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):169-72. PubMed ID: 16114387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Keith RW; Talis HP Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency modulated tone thresholds in normal and abnormally adapting ears. Young IM; Harbert F Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Feb; 79(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 5415599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy. Schultz MC J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 5027358 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study. Korsan-Bengtsen M Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies on qualitative speech recognition, sound recognition and auditory threshold]. Müller K Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1978; 30(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 730095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Aniansson G Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Modified Rhyme Test results from impaired- and normal-hearing listeners. Elkins EF J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Sep; 14(3):589-95. PubMed ID: 5163893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bone conduction speech discrimination: an indication of cochlear function in the immediate postoperative period. Robinson M; Kasden SD Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Apr; 103(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 849203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)]. von Wedel H Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical and social aspects of speech audiometry. A comparative study of various speech audiometric materials]. Parving A; Barfod J; Salomon G Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Jan; 138(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 1251486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Proceedings: ERA-findings in paracusic children with normal auditory threshold]. Schunicht R Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1973 Dec; 205(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 4785506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The SISI test in hearing loss of the cochlear origin]. Hibner B; Janczewski G Otolaryngol Pol; 1970; 24(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 5451463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Speech audiometry as a specific human hearing test]. Lorenz W Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1969 Oct; 24(42):1993-8. PubMed ID: 4916201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of severely hearing-impaired children on a closed-response, auditory speech discrimination test. Jones KO; Studebaker GA J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Sep; 17(3):531-40. PubMed ID: 4423159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]