These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5812167)

  • 1. Comparison of training methods in the production of prism adaptation.
    Foley JE; Maynes FJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1969 Jul; 81(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 5812167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Directional asymmetry of motion aftereffect.
    Scott TR; Lavender AD; McWhirt RA; Powell DA
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jun; 71(6):806-15. PubMed ID: 5939358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Illusory motion in depth: aftereffect of adaptation to changing size.
    Regan D; Beverley KI
    Vision Res; 1978; 18(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual movement aftereffect: evidence for independent adaptation to moving target and stationary surround.
    Strelow ER; Day RH
    Vision Res; 1975 Jan; 15(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1129958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A motion aftereffect for long-range stroboscopic apparent motion.
    von Grünau MW
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Jul; 40(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 3748763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enduring stereoscopic motion aftereffects induced by prolonged adaptation.
    Bowd C; Rose D; Phinney RE; Patterson R
    Vision Res; 1996 Nov; 36(22):3655-60. PubMed ID: 8976995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of distance and retinal velocity on duration of spiral aftereffect.
    Montgomery N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):1239-44. PubMed ID: 5160041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of background motion on the motion aftereffect.
    Smith AT; Musselwhite MJ; Hammond P
    Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 6506472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some critical factors in prism-adaptation.
    Cohen HB
    Am J Psychol; 1966 Jun; 79(2):285-90. PubMed ID: 5915913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stereodeficient subjects show substantial differences in interocular transfer of two motion adaptation aftereffects.
    McColl SL; Mitchell DE
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1889-900. PubMed ID: 9797965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The motion/disparity aftereffect: a preliminary study.
    Smith RA
    Vision Res; 1976; 16(12):1507-9. PubMed ID: 1007033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of the stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion aftereffect.
    Patterson R; Bowd C; Phinney R; Pohndorf R; Barton-Howard WJ; Angilletta M
    Vision Res; 1994 May; 34(9):1139-47. PubMed ID: 8184558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings.
    Keck MJ; Palella TD; Pantle A
    Vision Res; 1976; 16(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 1266060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Motion mechanisms with different spatiotemporal characteristics identified by an MAE technique with superimposed gratings.
    Shioiri S; Matsumiya K
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):30.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phases in movement after-effects and their relationship to the kinetic figural effect. Adaptation and conditioning processes.
    Bonnet C; Bouvier A; Petiteau H
    Psychol Res; 1976 Feb; 38(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 1250938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous and successive contrast effects in the perception of depth from motion-parallax and stereoscopic information.
    Graham M; Rogers B
    Perception; 1982; 11(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 7167333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect.
    Ware C; Mitchell DE
    Vision Res; 1974 Aug; 14(8):735-7. PubMed ID: 4424240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion.
    Levinson E; Sekuler R
    Vision Res; 1976; 16(7):779-81. PubMed ID: 960603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Motion aftereffects: evidence for parallel processing in motion perception.
    Favreau OE
    Vision Res; 1976; 16(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 1266059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer.
    Symons LA; Pearson PM; Timney B
    Perception; 1996; 25(6):651-60. PubMed ID: 8888298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.