BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5816041)

  • 1. Comparison of commercial and autogenous bacterins for control of the cranial form of fowl cholera in turkeys.
    Olson LD; McCune EL; Bond RE
    Avian Dis; 1969 May; 13(2):252-60. PubMed ID: 5816041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fowl cholera: induction of cross-protection in turkeys with bacterins prepared from host-passaged Pasteurella multocida.
    Rebers PA; Heddleston KL
    Avian Dis; 1977; 21(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 843303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative efficacy of commercial fowl cholera bacterins and autogenous bacterin in White Leghorn hens artificially infected with Pasteurella multocida.
    Bierer BW; Eleazer TH
    Poult Sci; 1968 Jul; 47(4):1162-5. PubMed ID: 5749583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of low-level rofenaid, low-level chlortetracycline, and vaccination with commercial bacterin for preventing pulmonary form of fowl cholera in turkeys.
    Olson LD
    Avian Dis; 1977; 21(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 869823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A streptomycin-dependent live pasteurella multocida type-3 vaccine for the prevention of fowl cholera in turkeys.
    Chengappa MM; Carter GR; Chang TS
    Avian Dis; 1979; 23(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 486008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fowl cholera: influence of Bordetella avium on vaccinal immunity of turkeys to Pasteurella multocida.
    Rimler RB; Rhoades KR
    Avian Dis; 1986; 30(4):838-9. PubMed ID: 3814022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observations on the prevalence of avian Pasteurella multocida serotypes.
    Langpap TJ; Matisheck PH
    Avian Dis; 1970 Aug; 14(3):491-3. PubMed ID: 5456432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental production of the cranial form of fowl cholera in turkeys.
    Olson LD; McCune EL
    Am J Vet Res; 1968 Aug; 29(8):1665-73. PubMed ID: 5690691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bacterin against fowl cholera in turkeys: protective quality of various preparations originated from broth cultures.
    Matsumoto M; Helfer DH
    Avian Dis; 1977; 21(3):382-93. PubMed ID: 907580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of two avirulent vaccines for preventing experimental fowl cholera in turkeys, and use of one vaccine in the field.
    Olson LD
    Avian Dis; 1977; 21(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 869825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Onset and duration of immunity and minimum dosage with CU cholera vaccine in turkeys via drinking water.
    Olson LD; Schlink GT
    Avian Dis; 1986; 30(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 3729873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fowl cholera in turkeys--the efficacy of adjuvant bacterins.
    Bhasin JL; Biberstein EL
    Avian Dis; 1968 Feb; 12(1):159-68. PubMed ID: 5643695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue irritation induced in turkeys by fowl cholera bacterins.
    Ahmed OA; Olson LD; McCune EL
    Avian Dis; 1974; 18(4):590-601. PubMed ID: 4433302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attenutated live fowl cholera vaccine. III. Laboratory and field vaccination trials in turkeys and chickens.
    Michael A; Geier E; Konshtok R; Hertman I; Markenson J
    Avian Dis; 1979; 23(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 546411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Rofenaid and a commercial bacterin for prevention of cranial form of fowl cholera in turkeys.
    Olson LD
    Poult Sci; 1977 Jul; 56(4):1098-1101. PubMed ID: 605073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Continuous use of a live vaccine in the drinking wate against fowl cholera infection in turkeys.
    Bierer BW; Eleazer TH
    Poult Sci; 1968 Jul; 47(4):1258-60. PubMed ID: 5725361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a live drinking water vaccine for fowl cholera in turkeys to a killed drinking water vaccine and to five injected commercial bacterins.
    Bierer BW
    Poult Sci; 1969 Mar; 48(2):633-6. PubMed ID: 5391179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of live avirulent M-9, Minnesota, and CU fowl cholera vaccines.
    Friedlander RC; Olson LD; McCune EL
    Avian Dis; 1991; 35(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1854311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immune response to fowl cholera antigens.
    Bairey MH
    Am J Vet Res; 1975 Apr; 36(4 Pt 2):575-8. PubMed ID: 1124871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Epizootiologic pattern of fowl cholera in turkeys in missouri.
    Olson LD; McCune EL; Bond RE
    Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc; 1968; 72():239-43. PubMed ID: 5257464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.