These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5822296)

  • 1. The attention of retardates and normals in distraction and non-distraction condtions.
    Follini P; Sitkowski CA; Stayton SE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Sep; 74(2):200-5. PubMed ID: 5822296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reaction times of retardates and normals as a function of relative stimulus frequency.
    Baumeister AA; Wilcox S; Greeson J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 May; 73(6):935-41. PubMed ID: 5785509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of variations in auditory-visual stimulation on activity levels of severe mental retardates.
    Forehand R; Baumeister AA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1970 Jan; 74(4):470-4. PubMed ID: 5434603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning and distractibility in normals and retardates.
    Whitman MA; Sprague RL
    Train Sch Bull (Vinel); 1968 Nov; 65(3):89-101. PubMed ID: 5758844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerosity discrimination of tachistoscopically presented dots by mental retardates and normals.
    Spitz HH; Hoats DL; Holden EA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Jul; 73(1):127-38. PubMed ID: 5673498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Like and cross modality recognition in retardates.
    Hinshaw EM; Heal LW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 May; 72(6):798-802. PubMed ID: 5654102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of distraction during and after learning a serial recall task.
    Sen A; Clarke AM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Jul; 73(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 5673504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective organization by retardates and normals during free recall of visual stimuli.
    Gerjuoy IR; Winters JJ; Pullenk MM; Spitz HH
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Mar; 73(5):791-7. PubMed ID: 5780065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of age on involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: a test of the frontal hypothesis of aging.
    Andrés P; Parmentier FB; Escera C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2564-8. PubMed ID: 16797613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complexity and position of stimuli as determinants of looking behavior in retardates and normals.
    Terdal LG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1967 Nov; 72(3):384-7. PubMed ID: 6077005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of various sounds and noise levels on stereotyped rocking of blind retardates.
    Smeets PM
    Train Sch Bull (Vinel); 1972 Feb; 68(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 5014171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of extraneous stimulation upon discrimination learning in normals and retardates.
    Belmont JM; Ellis NR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Jan; 72(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 5637885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gamma movement: a comparison of normals and retardates under several temporal conditions.
    Winters JJ; Gerjuoy IR
    Am J Ment Defic; 1967 Jan; 71(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 6033109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.
    Muller-Gass A; Schröger E
    Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons of gross, intensive, and extensive quantities by normals and retardates.
    McManis DL
    Child Dev; 1969 Mar; 40(1):237-44. PubMed ID: 5787705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The development of conservation and horizontal-vertical space perception in mental retardates.
    Stearns K; Borkowski JG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Mar; 73(5):785-90. PubMed ID: 5780064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Escera C; Andrés P; San Miguel I
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):408-32. PubMed ID: 17445791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some factors affecting distractibility in the mental retardate.
    Sen A; Clarke AM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Jul; 73(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 5673505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.