These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5822989)
21. Perception of binaural time differences in bone-conduction hearing of impulses. WIGAND ME Acta Otolaryngol; 1962; 55():175-87. PubMed ID: 14006870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. BONE-CONDUCTION THRESHOLDS OBTAINED BY PLACEMENT ON THE FOREHEAD. PETERSON JL; NASSBERG J South Med J; 1965 Feb; 58():218-22. PubMed ID: 14246948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. [Bone conduction]. FOURNIER JE J Soc Cienc Med Lisb; 1955; 119(9-10):524-54. PubMed ID: 13318824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Use of beat in examination of bone conduction; modified method]. ICHIKAWA N; SUZUKI T Ann Otolaryngol; 1956; 73(10-11):832-3. PubMed ID: 13382035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [The use of beats in the examination of bone conduction]. SUZUHI T; ICHIHAWA N Ann Otolaryngol; 1955; 72(11-12):903-9. PubMed ID: 13314272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Control of bone conduction by the Sensorii-Neural Acuity Level Test applied to vocal audiometry]. Rainville MJ Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1968; 89(7):469-75. PubMed ID: 5715344 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Bone conduction hearing sensitivity in normal-hearing subjects: transcutaneous stimulation at BAHA vs BCI position. Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Taghavi H; Eeg-Olofsson M Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):360-9. PubMed ID: 24588466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Facts and fallacies of bone conduction. WEILLE FL Laryngoscope; 1953 Mar; 63(3):183-211. PubMed ID: 13036219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Studies on determination of the degree of apparatus-related bone conduction in the Gelle test]. OLK E; WUELKER R; TEGTMEIER W Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1961 Oct; 40():786-90. PubMed ID: 14481853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Is it necessary to occlude the ear in bone-conduction testing at 4 kHz, in order to prevent air-borne radiation affecting the results? Tate Maltby M; Gaszczyk D Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):918-23. PubMed ID: 26446950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hearing screening using auditory steady state responses obtained by simultaneous air- and bone-conduction stimuli. Mijares E; Báez L; Cabrera L; Pérez-Abalo MC; Torres-Fortuny A Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2015; 66(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 24766784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [On the theory and practice of the Gelle test. A contribution to the problem of the air components of bone conduction]. MEHMKE S Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1960 Sep; 39():577-88. PubMed ID: 13768989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF VARIOUS METHODS FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF BONE CONDUCTIVITY]. KOZHEVNIKOVA AP Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1964; 26():14-8. PubMed ID: 14303849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of bone oscillator coupling method, placement location, and occlusion on bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses in infants. Small SA; Hatton JL; Stapells DR Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17204901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Comparative audiometric study of bone conduction and chondral conduction. Its importance in the diagnosis of endo- and retro-cochlear perception deafness]. Pialoux P; Fontelle P; Chouard CH; Freyss G Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1974 Mar; 91(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 4848331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The standardization of bone-conduction thresholds. Studebaker GA Laryngoscope; 1967 May; 77(5):823-35. PubMed ID: 6026275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Weber test; its significance in assessing the true value of bone conduction. RUBINSTEIN M; KLEIN L Acta Otolaryngol; 1957 Sep; 48(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 13469325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effective masking levels for 500 and 2000 Hz bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing. Small SA; Smyth A; Leon G Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 24121647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Evaluation of hearing after kophosurgery for hearing disorders. II. The importance of the Sullivan and Federici-Lewis tests in hearing loss operations]. Skovronský O; Marík E Cesk Otolaryngol; 1980 Dec; 29(6):331-5. PubMed ID: 7471260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]