These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5824040)

  • 1. Fluctuations of N1 amplitude in relation to click-intensity discrimination.
    Taub HB; Raab DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Oct; 46(4):969-78. PubMed ID: 5824040
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effects of masking sounds on the amplitude curves of the responses induced with clicks in various auditory relays].
    Legouix JP; Remond MC; Delvoye M
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1970; 164(6):1198-201. PubMed ID: 4252350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Masking, with background noise, of responses evoked by monaural and binaural stimulations in the accessory olivary nucleus].
    Legouix JP; Remond MC; Greenbaum H; Delvoye M
    C R Seances Soc Biol Fil; 1971; 165(4):780-4. PubMed ID: 4259485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response to noise of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey.
    Ruggero MA
    J Neurophysiol; 1973 Jul; 36(4):569-87. PubMed ID: 4197339
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The variability of single click evoked CAPs in the guinea pig as a function of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    de Sauvage RC; Cazals Y; Aran JM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1979; (9):167-78. PubMed ID: 294680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in evoked acoustic nerve action potential pattern due to transcochlear currents.
    Majoros M; Nunnally HN; Schlag JH; Webb RP
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1975 Nov; 54(11):418-23. PubMed ID: 1183553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of electrical current applied to cochlear partition on discharges in individual auditory-nerve fibers. I. Prolonged direct-current polarization.
    Konishi T; Teas DC; Wernick JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Jun; 47(6):1519-26. PubMed ID: 5426304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The antidromic compound action potential of the auditory nerve.
    Brown MC
    J Neurophysiol; 1994 May; 71(5):1826-34. PubMed ID: 8064350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adrenal insufficiency and electrophysiological measures of auditory sensitivity.
    Conn FW; Mast TE
    Am J Physiol; 1973 Dec; 225(6):1430-6. PubMed ID: 4760456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. ECAP growth function to increasing pulse amplitude or pulse duration demonstrates large inter-animal variability that is reflected in auditory cortex of the guinea pig.
    Adenis V; Gourévitch B; Mamelle E; Recugnat M; Stahl P; Gnansia D; Nguyen Y; Edeline JM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201771. PubMed ID: 30071005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulus-response relation for auditory-noise fibers: two-tone stimuli.
    Sachs MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Apr; 45(4):1025-36. PubMed ID: 5791612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [On the physiology of the centrifugal hearing system: lack of mutual interaction between the cochleae, measured by the click-elicited sum action potential N1 and N2 in electric supramaxillary stimulation of the contralateral acoustic nerve].
    Pfalz R
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1965; 185(2):575-7. PubMed ID: 5881086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Adaptational behaviour of peripheral and central acoustic responses in guinea pigs under the influence of various fractions of an extract from Gingko biloba (author's transl)].
    Stange G; Benning CD; Degenhardt M; Ottinger E
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1976; 26(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 989328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute effects of high-rate stimulation on auditory nerve function in guinea pigs.
    Tykocinski M; Shepherd RK; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():71-4. PubMed ID: 7668762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Animal experiment studies of the readaptation behavior of acoustic organ].
    Theissing J; Fraas G
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1968 Jan; 47(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 5670260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of intracochlear electrical stimulation on action potential of auditory nerve in guinea pigs].
    Chen X
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1989; 24(6):342-5, 384-5. PubMed ID: 2485460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory-nerve fiber responses to clicks in guinea pigs with a damaged cochlea.
    Versnel H; Prijs VF; Schoonhoven R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Feb; 101(2):993-1009. PubMed ID: 9035392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarity of dynamic range adjustment in auditory nerve and cochlear nuclei.
    Gibson DJ; Young ED; Costalupes JA
    J Neurophysiol; 1985 Apr; 53(4):940-58. PubMed ID: 3998799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Acoustic nerve in the excited phase--experimental studies].
    Oshima W
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1983 Jul; 86(7):770-85. PubMed ID: 6631585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Synaptic organization of eighth nerve afferents to cat dorsal cochlear nucleus.
    Manis PB; Brownell WE
    J Neurophysiol; 1983 Nov; 50(5):1156-81. PubMed ID: 6644365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.