These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5828332)

  • 21. Intestinal obstruction following perforation of the uterus with an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    De Villiers EH; Rosenstein PF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Oct; 96(4):592-3. PubMed ID: 5921088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Barrier contraceptive practice and male infertility as related factors to female breast cancer.
    Gjorgov AN
    God Zb Med Fak Skopje; 1978; 24():101-21. PubMed ID: 757155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wandering loops.
    Awon A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw; 1966 Oct; 73(5):858. PubMed ID: 5919112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Intrauterine contraceptives].
    Sven Farm Tidskr; 1966 May; 70(13):334-40. PubMed ID: 5960588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Barrier contraceptive practice and male infertility as related factors to breast cancer in married women. Preliminary results.
    Gjorgov AN
    God Zb Med Fak Skopje; 1978; 24():133-7. PubMed ID: 757157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is Essure warning a game changer?
    Rice S
    Mod Healthc; 2016 Mar; 46(10):12. PubMed ID: 27333666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uterine perforation with the Lippes loop.
    Clarke JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Jan; 94(2):285-6. PubMed ID: 5900667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A clinical trial on the use of Margulies Spiral (I.U.D.) amongst 200 women in Singapore.
    Sinha AC
    Singapore Med J; 1966 Mar; 7(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 5933752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative evaluation of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Hall RE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Jan; 94(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 5900329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Oral contraceptives and non-oral contraceptives: realities].
    Quéreux C; Raimond E; Graesslin O
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 May; 38 Spec No 3():F69-83. PubMed ID: 19736662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Letter: Potentially serious complication resulting from fitting of a diaphragm.
    Gassner CB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 121(4):575-6. PubMed ID: 1146891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reasons for discontinuing contraception among women in Bangkok.
    Sunyavivat S; Chumnijarakij T; Onthuam Y; Mehyar AH; Busca B; Christian B
    Bull World Health Organ; 1983; 61(5):861-5. PubMed ID: 6606502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experience with polyethylene ring: 1955-1965. 1.
    Sakurabayashi M
    Yokohama Med Bull; 1966 Jun; 17(3):93-101. PubMed ID: 5962264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Health status in the population using contraceptives].
    Rojas Bernal T; Sojo Aranda I; Cortés-Gallegos V
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1997 Nov; 65():461-4. PubMed ID: 9441146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Drugs: Breast-feeding and contraception.
    Pediatrics; 1981 Jul; 68(1):138-40. PubMed ID: 7195545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Comparison with other contraceptive methods available in the United States.
    Ashraf T; Arnold SB; Maxfield M
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):791-8. PubMed ID: 7837126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. New intra-uterine contraceptive device.
    Schwartz J; Reyner FC
    N Y State J Med; 1966 Aug; 66(16):2123-5. PubMed ID: 5221225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A new contraceptive device].
    Csoma B; Görgey M; Papp Z; Gardó S; Herpay G; Dolhay B
    Orv Hetil; 1969 May; 110(19):1074-5. PubMed ID: 5772265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. User's perception of the contraceptive vaginal ring: a field study in Brazil and the Dominican Republic.
    Hardy EE; Reyes Q; Gomez F; Portes-Carrasco R; Faúndes A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1983 Nov; 14(11):284-90. PubMed ID: 6417842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. New contraceptive choices across reproductive life.
    Foran TM
    Med J Aust; 2003 Jun; 178(12):616-20. PubMed ID: 12797848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.