These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5830985)
1. [Trial of a new objective optometric apparatus]. Wekstein C Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1965 Apr; 65(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 5830985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Set of standard aids for controlling optometric optics]. Mumzhiu AM Med Tekh; 1978; (1):53-6. PubMed ID: 642766 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The clinical trial of a prototype of the new LAR-2 serially produced laser optometer]. Rozenblium IuZ; Avetisov VE; Maksudova ZN Vestn Oftalmol; 1993; 109(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 8279102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic objective refraction in an office practice. Knoll HA; Mohrman R; Maier WL Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1970 Aug; 47(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 5273105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative study between subjective and objective refraction using the Autorefractor 6600 on 200 eyes in children]. Menerath JM; Michel M; Dalens H; Rigal D Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1189-93. PubMed ID: 6679825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The AP-94 device for examination of ocular refraction]. Volkov BP; Ponkratov AN; Skvortsov IuS; Tregub VP; Shmidt ER Med Tekh; 1997; (1):47-8. PubMed ID: 9148079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of the keratometer in refraction. PLATT BG U S Armed Forces Med J; 1954 Jun; 5(6):899-900. PubMed ID: 13169461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Optometry with the use of diminution of the retinal image by distancing the test to the examined subject]. Kedzia B; Jasińska J; Wrocławski J Klin Oczna; 1982; 84(1-2):9-11. PubMed ID: 7132214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Objective refraction: comparison of retinoscopy and automated techniques. Berman M; Nelson P; Caden B Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Mar; 61(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 6720868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a range of autorefractors. McCaghrey GE; Matthews FE Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Apr; 13(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 8265146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of optometric findings taken in refracting rooms of different shapes. Mauney MC; Porter VF J Am Optom Assoc; 1969 Jun; 40(6):607-9. PubMed ID: 5789180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The calibration of a 2.5x Galilean focusable telescope as an optometer for refraction. Cheng D; Woo GC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Jul; 20(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 10962700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated refraction in aphakia--1. Its accuracy and repeatability compared to a single-practitioner conventional technique. Guillon M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1981; 1(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 7342010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A new ophthalmologic refractometer assisted by a microprocessor]. Corno F; Ratier C; Simon J; Zenatti C J Fr Ophtalmol; 1984; 7(6-7):485-92. PubMed ID: 6501787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Image methods in the development of optometry]. Shelepin IuE; Makulov VB Med Tekh; 1996; (4):41-3. PubMed ID: 8965667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical evaluation of the Dioptron II Ultima B]. Risse JF; Villard C; Carre H Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1983 Oct; 83(10):1179-84. PubMed ID: 6679824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Aniseikonia and space perception--after 50 years. Bannon RE; Neumueller J; Boeder P; Burian HM Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom; 1970 Jun; 47(6):423-41. PubMed ID: 4912937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A new automated subjective optometer. Bannon RE Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Jul; 54(7):433-8. PubMed ID: 931009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]