These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 583539)
1. Health planning in Alaska: a historical review and a new law (PL 96-79). Brownsberger K; Chase L Alaska Med; 1979 Nov; 21(6):78-80. PubMed ID: 583539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Appropriateness Review: the law and the challenge. Edwards B Tex Hosp; 1980 Jun; 36(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 10273206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Current trends in health planning re: Public law 93--641. Schklar R J Tenn Med Assoc; 1979 Jul; 72(7):522-4. PubMed ID: 491573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. planning is a model for Canada. Chenoy N Hosp Adm Can; 1978 Apr; 20(4):51, 53-4. PubMed ID: 10306801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Most feel HSAs can't handle new regulations. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1978 Jul; 8(7):13-4. PubMed ID: 149233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Health Systems Agency and State Agency reviews of the appropriateness of existing institutional health services and of proposed new institutional health services. Fed Regist; 1978 May; 43(95):21273-82. PubMed ID: 10307351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. CON regs hand HSAs a 'loaded gun'. Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1980 Dec; 10(12):31-2. PubMed ID: 10249155 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Health systems agencies and state health planning and development agencies: proposed rulemaking. Fed Regist; 1978 Mar; 43(53):11229-41. PubMed ID: 10307339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Certificate of need. Harris S J Am Health Care Assoc; 1981 Jan; 7(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10273240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pennsylvania's new certificate-of-need law. Schwartz JB Health Law Proj Libr Bull; 1979; 4(11-12):364-70. PubMed ID: 10278035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regs control the planning process as well as the plan. Berriman WT Hospitals; 1980 Apr; 54(8):51-4. PubMed ID: 7358375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriateness review: still an ill-defined process. Kopit WG Hosp Prog; 1981 Mar; 62(3):54-6. PubMed ID: 10273244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health systems agency and state agency reviews of the appropriateness of existing institutional health services: Public Health Service, HEW. Final regulations. Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(239):71754-73. PubMed ID: 10273172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Public Law 93-641: what does it mean? Rorrie CC J Natl Assoc Priv Psychiatr Hosp; 1977; 9(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 10305546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health care in Newark: the regional health planning council HSA. Urban Health; 1978 Dec; 7(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10277922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Planning has some new dimensions. Cunningham RM Trustee; 1981 Nov; 34(11):44-6, 49. PubMed ID: 10253328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health planning chief foresees more support for planning process. Cain HP Hospitals; 1978 Mar; 52(5):54-7. PubMed ID: 624536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. HSAs urged to treat appropriateness review as planning, not regulation. Berger S Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1980 Aug; 13(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 10273219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Health Planning Act: a new testing ground for state vs. federal control. Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1976 Aug; 9(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 10246678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicians and health planning. Johnson DE Alaska Med; 1980; 22(6):92-3. PubMed ID: 6894354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]