These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems. Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Initial experiences with pulsed fluoroscopy on a multifunctional fluoroscopic unit]. Herrmann K; Helmberger T; Waggershauser T; Schätzl M; Allmendinger H; Reiser M Rofo; 1996 Nov; 165(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8998321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic collimation in fluoroscopy with image intensifier. Smythe A J Coll Radiol Australas; 1965 Oct; 9(3):293-4. PubMed ID: 5836223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided radiation therapy simulation: image intensifier spatial distortion correction for large field of view digital fluoroscopy. Cosby NS; Leszczynski KW Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2265-78. PubMed ID: 9725603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative ovarian dosimetry in pelvic roentgenography with normal and hard ray technic in fluoroscopy of the true pelvis under normal conditions and with use of the image intensifier]. DIETZ W Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1956 Oct; 85(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 13384518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reduction of patient doses from barium meal and barium enema examinations through changes in equipment factors. Martin CJ; Hunter S Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1196-205. PubMed ID: 7874418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of aberrations in image-intensified fluoroscopy. Casperson LW; Spiegler P; Grollman JH Med Phys; 1976; 3(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 1264038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more. Nickoloff EL Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A physical assessment of the imaging performance of panel-type X-ray image intensifier. Hay GA; Cowen AR Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):24-8. PubMed ID: 7448496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation exposure in fluoroscopy of the shoulder: a comparison between mini and conventional C-arm image intensifier. Tantigate D; Riansuwan K; Sanguanwongwan W; Mahaisavariya B J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Sep; 97 Suppl 9():S88-91. PubMed ID: 25365897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation protection in fluoroscopy with an image intensifier. Hemmingsson A; Löfroth PO Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1978; 19(6):1007-13. PubMed ID: 735836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Examination of the image quality from digital fluoroscopy equipment with 1k- and 2k-image matrix]. Kunz G; Busch HP Rofo; 2000 Aug; 172(8):707-13. PubMed ID: 11013613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dental radioscopy with an image intensifier]. Bertreux P; Salaun M Ligament; 1980; (136):71-3. PubMed ID: 6936584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of image intensifier photofluorography and full-size radiography in abdominal angiography. Aakhus T; Lantto L; Kolmannskog F; Winter A Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981; 22(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 7257851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]