These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 583893)

  • 1. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric defibrillation: current flow is improved by using "adult" electrode paddles.
    Atkins DL; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1994 Jul; 94(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 8008545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance to transthoracic direct current discharge: a model for testing interface material.
    Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 634191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defibrillator electrode-chest wall coupling agents: influence on transthoracic impedance and shock success.
    Aylward PE; Kieso R; Hite P; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):682-6. PubMed ID: 4031281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: revised version.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1991 Jan; 78(285):85-95. PubMed ID: 1670068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1990 Sep; 76(281):903-13. PubMed ID: 2236476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks.
    Dahl CF; Ewy GA; Ewy MD; Thomas ED
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1272089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
    Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
    Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transthoracic defibrillation: importance of avoiding electrode placement directly on the female breast.
    Pagan-Carlo LA; Spencer KT; Robertson CE; Dengler A; Birkett C; Kerber RE
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Feb; 27(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 8557919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Schoenlein W; Minton M; Grubbs S; Wilcox P
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 1272091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The implantable automatic cardioverter-defibrillator].
    Klein H; Tröster J; Trappe HJ; Becht I; Siclari F
    Herz; 1990 Apr; 15(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2188891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relative contribution of paddle electrode area and edge length to transthoracic impedance from a dc defibrillator discharge.
    Taren D; Ewy GA
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 440179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Leakage of energy to the body surface during defibrillation shock by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) system--experimental evaluation during defibrillation shocks through the right ventricular lead and the subcutaneous active-can in canines.
    Niwano S; Kitano Y; Moriguchi M; Yoshizawa N; Kashiwa T; Suyama M; Toyoshima T; Izumi T
    Jpn Circ J; 2001 Mar; 65(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 11266198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillation: ensuring its success.
    Health Devices; 1990 Feb; 19(2):32-56. PubMed ID: 2372318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decreasing the time to defibrillation: a comparative study of defibrillator electrode designs.
    Adams BD; Easty DM; Stuffel E; Hartman I
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):171-4. PubMed ID: 16053942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental evaluation and initial clinical application of new self-adhesive defibrillation electrodes.
    Kerber RE; Martins JB; Ferguson DW; Jensen SR; Parke JD; Kieso R; Melton J
    Int J Cardiol; 1985 May; 8(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 3997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.