These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5839278)

  • 1. Effectiveness of deprivation, incentive quality, and number of reinforcements after numerous reconditionings.
    Miles RC
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Dec; 60(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 5839278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ON THE COMBINATION OF DRIVE AND INCENTIVE MOTIVATION.
    BLACK RW
    Psychol Rev; 1965 Jul; 72():310-7. PubMed ID: 14348426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of competing responses as a function of deprivation time.
    Champion RA
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 6034005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.
    Uhl CN; Young AG
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 6034010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deprivation level, competing responses, and the PRE.
    Mikulka PJ; Pavlik WB
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Feb; 18(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 5908514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drive shifting prior to extinction of bar pressing reinforced by different sucrose incentives.
    Beck RC
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Oct; 21(2):417-21. PubMed ID: 6079234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of food deprivation on unreinforced and light-reinforced bar pressing.
    Smith RC; Donahoe JW
    J Genet Psychol; 1966 Jun; 108(2d Half):213-9. PubMed ID: 5961981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING, EXTINCTION, AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT.
    BLACK RW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():67-74. PubMed ID: 14256251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DRIVE SHIFTS DURING EXTINCTION: EFFECTS ON EXTINCTION AND SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY OF BAR-PRESSING BEHAVIOR.
    HATTON GI
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Jun; 59():385-91. PubMed ID: 14313778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some parameters of latent learning and generalized drives.
    Khavari KA; Eisman EH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Dec; 77(3):463-9. PubMed ID: 5118255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Further test of deprivation trace hypothesis.
    Beck RC; Carter DJ
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Aug; 17(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 5826505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. IMPAIRED OPERANT BEHAVIOR FOLLOWING LESIONS OF THE THALAMIC TASTE NUCLEUS.
    OAKLEY B
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Apr; 59():202-10. PubMed ID: 14288343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance to extinction as a function of number of nonreinforced trials and effortfulness of response.
    Young AG
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Oct; 72(4):610-3. PubMed ID: 5969737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement value and substitutability of sucrose and wheel running: implications for activity anorexia.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Duncan ID
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Sep; 86(2):131-58. PubMed ID: 17002224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Incentive learning following reinforcer devaluation is not conditional upon the motivational state during re-exposure.
    Lopez M; Balleine B; Dickinson A
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1992 Nov; 45(4):265-84. PubMed ID: 1475400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A reversed partial-reinforcement effect.
    Pavlik WB; Carlton PL
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Oct; 70(4):417-23. PubMed ID: 5826031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incentive contrast and deprivation factors in a discrete-trial bar-press situation.
    Dunham PJ
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Dec; 64(3):485-7. PubMed ID: 6082881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. HUMAN-EYELID CONDITIONING: THE RECENT EXPERIMENTAL LITERATURE.
    ROSS LE; HARTMAN TF
    Genet Psychol Monogr; 1965 Feb; 71():177-220. PubMed ID: 14279692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of a conditioned positive reinforcer through removal of an aversive stimulus.
    Murray AK; Strandberg JM
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Oct; 60(2):281-3. PubMed ID: 5832362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.