These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5839510)

  • 1. Effects of number and percentage of rewarded trials on the acquisition and extinction of lever pressing using a discrete-trial procedure.
    Porter JJ; Hug JJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 5839510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrete-trials lever pressing in the rat as a function of pattern of reinforcement, effortfulness of response, and amount of reward.
    Gonzalez RC; Bainbridge P; Bitterman ME
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Feb; 61(1):110-22. PubMed ID: 5903265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to extinction of the continuously rewarded response in within-subject partial-reinforcement experiments.
    Rashotte ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Feb; 76(2):206-14. PubMed ID: 5636561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of haloperidol on the multitrial partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE): evidence for neuroleptic drug action on nonreinforcement but not on reinforcement.
    Feldon J; Weiner I
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 105(3):407-14. PubMed ID: 1686816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.
    Uhl CN; Young AG
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 6034010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acquisition and extinction under single alternation and random partial-reinforcement conditions with a 24-hour intertrial interval.
    Surridge CT; Amsel A
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Sep; 72(3):361-8. PubMed ID: 5968682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects.
    Spear NE; Pavlik WB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF CONDITIONING ASSOCIATIONS AND EXTINCTION PERCENTAGES.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():611-2. PubMed ID: 14241096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of magnitude and percentage of reward on subsequent patterns of runway speed.
    Hill WF; Wallace WP
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 6034008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of intertrial reinforcement on resistance to extinction following extended training.
    Black RW; Spence KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 5839508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of different subregions of the basolateral amygdala in cue-induced reinstatement and extinction of food-seeking behavior.
    McLaughlin RJ; Floresco SB
    Neuroscience; 2007 Jun; 146(4):1484-94. PubMed ID: 17449185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aftereffects and delay of reward.
    Capaldi EJ; Poynor H
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Jan; 71(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 5902146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.
    Brooks CI
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 5567141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of nonrewarded and partially rewarded placements on resistance to extinction in the rat.
    Capaldi ED
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Sep; 76(3):483-90. PubMed ID: 5127954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.
    Yin HH; Knowlton BJ; Balleine BW
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16153716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION IN GOLDFISH AS A FUNCTION OF SHOCK-REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE.
    GELLER I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 14218288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. EFFECTS OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD AND PERCENTAGE OF REINFORCEMENT ON A LEVER MOVEMENT RESPONSE.
    BRUNING JL
    Child Dev; 1964 Mar; 35():281-5. PubMed ID: 14128815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the MK-801-induced appetitive extinction deficit with pressing for reward and associated pERK1/2 staining in prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens.
    Holahan MR; Westby EP; Albert K
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 228(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 22182675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.