These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5839923)

  • 1. Pitch-discrimination at high frequencies by air- and bone-conduction.
    Corso JF; Levine M
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Dec; 78(4):557-66. PubMed ID: 5839923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of ability to discriminate frequency of bone-conducted ultrasound by mismatch fields.
    Yamashita A; Nishimura T; Nakagawa S; Sakaguchi T; Hosoi H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(2):260-2. PubMed ID: 18455304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ON THE SUMMATION OF PITCH AND LOUDNESS IN AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION OF THE WHITE RAT.
    HYTOENEN Y
    Ann Acad Sci Fenn A; 1964; 106():SUPPL 6:1-9. PubMed ID: 14202155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CENTRAL PERIODICITY PITCH.
    NIEDER PC; CREELMAN CD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1965 Jan; 37():136-8. PubMed ID: 14265100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS OF THE EUCLIDEAN-PYTHAGOREAN STRUCTURE AND QUADRATIC METRICS IN THE PERCEPTUAL MANIFOLD OF THE SENSE OF HEARING.
    JAUHIAINEN T; HAEKKINEN V
    Ann Acad Sci Fenn A; 1964; 106():SUPPL 20:1-20. PubMed ID: 14202158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some observations on ultrasonic perception in man.
    BELLUCCI RJ; SCHNEIDER DE
    Trans Am Otol Soc; 1962; 50():126-34. PubMed ID: 13967175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [On a new test of frequency discrimination in a free field].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 5746208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonic and ultrasonic equal-loudness contours.
    Corso JF; Levine M
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Oct; 70(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 5826030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [On musical hearing; its relation to bone conduction hearing and cochleovestibular relations].
    KOBRAK F
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1953 Apr; 32(4):253-64. PubMed ID: 13091021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing loss and middle ear involvement in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
    Ikiz AO; Unsal E; Kirkim G; Erdag TK; Guneri EA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jul; 71(7):1079-85. PubMed ID: 17482280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonlinear explanation for bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing.
    Fujimoto K; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):210-5. PubMed ID: 15925206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ["Ultrasound hearing aid" for deaf patients? Comments on human ultrasound hearing].
    Ptok M
    HNO; 1993 Feb; 41(2):A12-3. PubMed ID: 8463113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The auditory fusion frequency of intermittent sounds.
    Smiarowski RA; Kintz BL
    J Gen Psychol; 1966 Jan; 74(1st Half):129-43. PubMed ID: 5901599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Considerations on the threshold of timbre discrimination in normal subjects].
    Madonia T; Lentini G
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971; 92(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 5565274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting operative hearing results in stapes surgery: does choice of outcome measure make a difference?
    Berliner KI; Doyle KJ; Goldenberg RA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Mar; 17(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 8723950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Results of a new method for the measurement of the pitch and volume discrimination thresholds].
    SCHUBERT K
    Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1953; 163(2-6):437-49. PubMed ID: 13139574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term hearing results following stapedotomy.
    Dornhoffer JL; Bailey HA; Graham SS
    Am J Otol; 1994 Sep; 15(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 8572071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.