196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 584772)
1. Neurological examination: nursing assessment for nursing purposes.
Mitchell PH; Irvin NJ
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1977 Mar; 9(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 584772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Neurological assessment: a refresher.
Noah P
RN; 2004 Sep; Suppl():18-23; quiz 24. PubMed ID: 15499798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Foundation for practice. Neuroassessment for neuroscience nurses.
Neatherlin JS
Nurs Clin North Am; 1999 Sep; 34(3):573-92. PubMed ID: 10433648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient assessment: neurological examination. Part 1. Programmed instruction.
Mechner F
Am J Nurs; 1975 Sep; 75(9):suppl: 1-24. PubMed ID: 1041673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurologic evaluation of the preterm infant.
Bowen F
NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(1):75-95. PubMed ID: 1562448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The neurologic examination in patients with central nervous system trauma.
Rimel RW; Tyson GW
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1979 Sep; 11(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 258248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revised Neurological Examination for Subtle Signs (1985).
Denckla MB
Psychopharmacol Bull; 1985; 21(4):773-800. PubMed ID: 4089106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The neurologic examination in the 1st year of life. 2].
Mattigk G
Kinderarztl Prax; 1989 Jan; 57(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 2651777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What you need to know about neurological testing.
Fisher J
RN; 1987 Jan; ():47-53. PubMed ID: 3642678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Recognition of neurological dysfunction.
Lyons M
Nurse Pract; 1977; 4(5):34-7. PubMed ID: 492616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Preliminary assessment of the nervous system of workers in view of current propositions and methods].
Polakowska B
Med Pr; 1994; 45(5):435-9. PubMed ID: 7997152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Developmental neurologic examination of premature infants. I. Nerve development and functional neurologic examination methods].
Katona F; Dobos A; Frank K
Orv Hetil; 1975 Nov; 116(47):2769-73. PubMed ID: 1196612
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Strategy, tactics, and accuracy in neurological evaluation.
Landau WM
Ann Neurol; 1990 Jul; 28(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 2375638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Systems of life No 88. Systems and signs: examining the cranial nerves - completed.
Roberts A
Nurs Times; 1982 Apr 7-13; 78(14):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 6918967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Neurologic examination in the 1st year of life. 1].
Mattigk G
Kinderarztl Prax; 1988 Dec; 56(12):579-84. PubMed ID: 3226054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. On assessing the usefulness of the PANESS.
Broman M
Am J Psychiatry; 1978 Sep; 135(9):1114-5. PubMed ID: 696945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The neurological exam: striking a nerve.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2012 Mar; 71(3):A5. PubMed ID: 22451213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. How to assess neurologically impaired patients.
Silver BA
Adv Clin Care; 1989; 4(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 2818815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurological assessment.
Barker E; Moore K
RN; 1992 Apr; 55(4):28-34. PubMed ID: 1570468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Chapter 16: history of the development of the neurological examination.
Fine EJ; Ziad Darkhabani M
Handb Clin Neurol; 2010; 95():213-33. PubMed ID: 19892119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
