These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5848390)
1. Why Civil Rights means women's rights. Horty JF Mod Hosp; 1965 Nov; 105(5):64-6. PubMed ID: 5848390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Benign sex discrimination revisited: constitutional and moral issues in banning sex-selection abortion. Schedler G Pepperdine Law Rev; 1988; 15(3):295-343. PubMed ID: 11659237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. ERA: equal rights for abortion? Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):29-44. PubMed ID: 11651741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world. Scott TL Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decree No. 19157-J of 1 August 1989. Costa Rica Annu Rev Popul Law; 1989; 16():128. PubMed ID: 12344090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gender discrimination in the medical community. Scott AK Update; 1995 Jul; 11(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosecution of mothers of drug-exposed babies: constitutional and criminal theory. McGinnis DM Univ PA Law Rev; 1990 Dec; 139(2):505-39. PubMed ID: 11651407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of the rights of pregnant women in prisons and detention facilities. McHugh GA New Engl J Prison Law; 1980; 6(2):231-63. PubMed ID: 11655730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Firing the woman to protect the fetus: the reconciliation of fetal protection with employment opportunity goals under Title VII. Williams WW Georgetown Law J; 1981 Feb; 69(3):641-704. PubMed ID: 11649426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. You can't tell the men from the women--on the payroll. Feld LG Mod Hosp; 1973 Mar; 120(3):81-3. PubMed ID: 4782449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Off the pedestal and into the arena: toward including women in experimental protocols. Gorenberg H; White A Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(1):205-46. PubMed ID: 11659599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice. Davis PC; Gilligan C McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [The rights of the Colombian family in the U.N. Convention]. Yanuzova M Profamilia; 1989 Dec; 5(15):53-7. PubMed ID: 12282902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customary law row looming. Khumalo B South Afr Polit Econ Mon; 1993 Nov; 7(2):28. PubMed ID: 12345311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Women and the constitution: what to do when culture strikes back. Nhlapo T South Afr Polit Econ Mon; 1992 Nov; 6(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 12291289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospitals and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Hospitals; 1966 Jun; 40(11):19 passim. PubMed ID: 5934411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prohibiting amniocentesis in India: a solution to the problem of female infanticide or a problem to the solution of prenatal diagnosis? Gorman-Stapleton O ILSA J Int Law; 1990; 14():23-43. PubMed ID: 11659426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]