These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats. Bond NW; Blackman DE; Scruton P J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 4759059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lick-shock contingencies in the rat. Quinsey VL J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 Jan; 17(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 5019998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Punishment of schedule-controlled behavior with beta-carboline injections: antagonism and comparisons with other compounds. Takada K; Barrett JE; Allen MS; Cook JM; Katz JL J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1992 Apr; 261(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 1560359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reversal of preference under progressive-ratio schedules by punishment. Dardano JF J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):133-46. PubMed ID: 5645869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interresponse-time punishment: a basis for shock-maintained behavior. Galbicka G; Platt JR J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):291-308. PubMed ID: 6736858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of chlordiazepoxide HCl administration upon punishment and conditioned suppression in the rat. Rawlins JN; Feldon J; Salmon P; Gray JA; Garrud P Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 70(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 6777809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the punishing effects of response-produced shock and response-produced time out. McMillan DE J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Sep; 10(5):439-49. PubMed ID: 4963564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drugs and punished responding. II. d-Amphetamine-induced increases in punished responding. Foree DD; Moretz FH; McMillan DE J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Sep; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 4752089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Counter conditioning in an operant conflict situation. Williams DR; Barry H J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Feb; 61(1):154-6. PubMed ID: 5903273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Punishment and negative reinforcement of stuttering using electric shock. Martin R; Louis KS; Haroldson S; Hasbrouck J J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):478-90. PubMed ID: 1186157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding. Powell RW J Exp Anal Behav; 1971 Jan; 15(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 5547283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of discrete visual feedback on the electrodermal control of a stressful situation. Burns RA Biofeedback Self Regul; 1981 Mar; 6(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 7260180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Punishment-specific effects of pentobarbital: dependency on the type of punisher. Branch MN; Nicholson G; Dworkin SI J Exp Anal Behav; 1977 Nov; 28(3):285-93. PubMed ID: 562919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrodermal discrimination with visual feedback in two incompatible stressful situations. A yoked control comparison. Burns RA; Dupree ES Pavlov J Biol Sci; 1986; 21(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 3714327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predator videos and electric shock function as punishers for zebrafish (Danio rerio). Kuroda T; Mizutani Y; Cançado CRX; Podlesnik CA J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):116-129. PubMed ID: 30592052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]