These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

47 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5860926)

  • 1. [Speech and its amplification in severe deafness].
    Lafon JC
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1965; 86(11):1113-9. PubMed ID: 5860926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Synthetic speech and its practical application].
    Pimonow L
    C R Acad Hebd Seances Acad Sci D; 1966 Feb; 262(6):672-4. PubMed ID: 4955901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Report on the experiments undertaken and the results obtained at the Institute de Paris with various apparatus during recent years].
    Bouillon JP
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1965; 86(11):1120-5. PubMed ID: 5860927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of training on naïve listeners' judgments of the speech intelligibility of children with severe-to-profound hearing loss.
    Ellis LW; Beltyukova SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1114-23. PubMed ID: 18664708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to Duffy.
    Davis JL
    ASHA; 1993 Aug; 35(8):5. PubMed ID: 8216480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voice analysis in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Campisi P
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 70(4):760. PubMed ID: 16442167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and sensitivity of intelligibility judgments by severely and profoundly hearing-impaired children.
    Ching T; Newall P; Wigney D
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():151-3. PubMed ID: 7545379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Benefits of short interimplant delays in children receiving bilateral cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 19318886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Results and indications of a multichannel cochlear implant in prelingual deep deafness].
    Chouard CH; Meyer B; Fugain C; Monneron L
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(1-2):20-7. PubMed ID: 7668580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation?
    Connor CM; Craig HK; Raudenbush SW; Heavner K; Zwolan TA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):628-44. PubMed ID: 17086075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What can be expected from a late cochlear implantation?
    Kos MI; Deriaz M; Guyot JP; Pelizzone M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 73(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 19054582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech sounds: evaluation of a device for their visual presentation.
    Potvin AR; Foreit KG; Lam K; Trued S; Potvin JH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1980 Nov; 61(11):542-6. PubMed ID: 7436717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Rehabilitation of hearing aid-fitted individuals].
    Saussus R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1966; 20(2):154-65. PubMed ID: 5932673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between two perception tests in patients with severe and profoundly severe prelingual sensori-neural deafness.
    Schindler A; Leonardi M; Cavallo M; Ottaviani F; Schindler O
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Apr; 23(2):73-7. PubMed ID: 14526553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Speech perception in children fitted with Nucleus mini system 22 implants].
    Seeger T; Reid J
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1993; 114(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 8059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term categorical auditory performance and speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking prelingually deaf children with early cochlear implantation in Taiwan.
    Wu CM; Sun YS; Liu TC
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Feb; 33(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 18302552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
    Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of room acoustics and sound-field amplification on word recognition performance in young adult listeners in suboptimal listening conditions.
    Larsen JB; Vega A; Ribera JE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 17(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 18519579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.