BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 588654)

  • 1. Significance testing to establish equivalence between treatments, with special reference to data in the form of 2X2 tables.
    Dunnett CW; Gent M
    Biometrics; 1977 Dec; 33(4):593-602. PubMed ID: 588654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How order affects the sign test.
    Rayner JC; Best DJ
    Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1416-21. PubMed ID: 9453784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exact significance testing to establish treatment equivalence with ordered categorical data.
    Mehta CR; Patel NR; Tsiatis AA
    Biometrics; 1984 Sep; 40(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 6518249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing whether an identified treatment is best.
    Laska EM; Meisner MJ
    Biometrics; 1989 Dec; 45(4):1139-51. PubMed ID: 2611321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mantel-Haenszel-type tests for testing equivalence or more than equivalence in comparative clinical trials.
    Yanagawa T; Tango T; Hiejima Y
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):859-64. PubMed ID: 7981407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A confirmatory strategy for therapeutic equivalence trials.
    Kieser M
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1995 Jul; 33(7):388-90. PubMed ID: 7582393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sequential equivalence testing and repeated confidence intervals, with applications to normal and binary responses.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Biometrics; 1993 Mar; 49(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 8513110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple testing to establish superiority/equivalence of a new treatment compared with k standard treatments for unbalanced designs.
    Kwong KS; Cheung SH; Chan WS
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):491-8. PubMed ID: 15180675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The importance of equivalence trials in showing the usefulness of treatments].
    Hermens ML; van Hout HP; Terluin B; Adèr HJ; de Haan M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(44):2162-6. PubMed ID: 14626832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On estimating the difference between two probabilities, with special reference to clinical trials.
    Anbar D
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 6871355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data].
    Ivanković D; Tiljak MK
    Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing for individual and population equivalence based on the proportion of similar responses.
    Rom DM; Hwang E
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1489-505. PubMed ID: 8855476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An inferential confidence interval method of establishing statistical equivalence that corrects Tryon's (2001) reduction factor.
    Tryon WW; Lewis C
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Sep; 13(3):272-7. PubMed ID: 18778155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Review of statistical procedures for determining the equivalency of two treatments].
    Com-Nougue C; Rodary C
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1987; 35(5):416-30. PubMed ID: 3324228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A note on the power of Fisher's least significant difference procedure.
    Meier U
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 17128424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring rare serious adverse events from a new treatment and testing for a difference from historical controls.
    Fay MP; Huang CY; Twum-Danso NA
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(6):598-610. PubMed ID: 18042569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tests of non-null hypothesis on proportions for stratified data.
    Zhao G
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(9):1429-46. PubMed ID: 17668916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Some issues in the design and interpretation of 'negative' clinical studies.
    Makuch RW; Johnson MF
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 May; 146(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 3963987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Approximate interval estimation of the difference in binomial parameters: correction for skewness and extension to multiple tables.
    Gart JJ; Nam JM
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):637-43. PubMed ID: 2242407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.