These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5888732)

  • 1. An optimal strategy for repeated n-person games.
    Wilson AL
    Behav Sci; 1963 Oct; 8(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 5888732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coalition formation under different conditions of play in a three-person competitive game.
    Vinacke WE; Lichtman CM; Cherulnik PD
    J Gen Psychol; 1967 Oct; 77(2d Half):165-76. PubMed ID: 6072969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BEHAVIOR IN CERTAIN ZERO-SUM, TWO-PERSON GAMES.
    LITTIG LW
    J Soc Psychol; 1965 Jun; 66():113-25. PubMed ID: 14290383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpersonal effects of interpersonal behavior.
    Shannon J; Guerney B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1973 Apr; 26(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 4695483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A profit-sharing interpretation of Shapley value for N-person games.
    Eisenman RL
    Behav Sci; 1967 Sep; 12(5):396-8. PubMed ID: 6059772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Anterior Insula Tracks Behavioral Entropy during an Interpersonal Competitive Game.
    Takahashi H; Izuma K; Matsumoto M; Matsumoto K; Omori T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0123329. PubMed ID: 26039634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental studies of interdependent mixed-motive games.
    Rapoport A; Cole NS
    Behav Sci; 1968 May; 13(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 5661015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the competitive context: an examination of person-situation interactions.
    Abuhamdeh S; Csikszentmihalyi M
    J Pers; 2009 Oct; 77(5):1615-35. PubMed ID: 19678872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intergroup attitudes and strategies in games between opponents of the same or of a different race.
    Wilson W; Kayatani M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 May; 9(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 4875439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power, the use of power, and cooperative choice in a two-person game.
    Komorita SS; Sheposh JP; Braver SL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Feb; 8(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 5644472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of incentive magnitude and "motivational orientation" upon choice behavior in a two-person nonzero-sum game.
    Radlow R; Weidner MF; Hurst PM
    J Soc Psychol; 1968 Apr; 74(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 5642217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competitive processes. II. Stability of random systems.
    Ladde GS
    J Theor Biol; 1977 Oct; 68(3):331-54. PubMed ID: 599939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of life, coach behaviour and competitive anxiety in Winter Youth Olympic Games participants.
    Ledochowski L; Unterrainer C; Ruedl G; Schnitzer M; Kopp M
    Br J Sports Med; 2012 Dec; 46(15):1044-7. PubMed ID: 23148326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpersonal and electrocardiographic responses of Type A's and Type B's in competitive socioeconomic games.
    Van Egeren LF; Abelson JL; Sniderman LD
    J Psychosom Res; 1983; 27(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 6687610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competitive and cooperative arm rehabilitation games played by a patient and unimpaired person: effects on motivation and exercise intensity.
    Goršič M; Cikajlo I; Novak D
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 14(1):23. PubMed ID: 28330504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic probability of reinforcement for cooperation: Random game termination in the centipede game.
    Krockow EM; Colman AM; Pulford BD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):349-364. PubMed ID: 29574760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exploring the enjoyment of playing browser games.
    Klimmt C; Schmid H; Orthmann J
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2009 Apr; 12(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 19260776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spreading the blame: The allocation of responsibility amongst multiple agents.
    Gerstenberg T; Lagnado DA
    Cognition; 2010 Apr; 115(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 20070958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crosstalk in concurrent repeated games impedes direct reciprocity and requires stronger levels of forgiveness.
    Reiter JG; Hilbe C; Rand DG; Chatterjee K; Nowak MA
    Nat Commun; 2018 Feb; 9(1):555. PubMed ID: 29416030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory for and experience of differential competitive behavior of individuals and groups.
    Pemberton MB; Insko CA; Schopler J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Nov; 71(5):953-66. PubMed ID: 8939043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.