These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 588883)

  • 21. Identification of Mandarin tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Hung TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3235-48. PubMed ID: 19045807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Absolute pitch among students at the Shanghai Conservatory of Music: a large-scale direct-test study.
    Deutsch D; Li X; Shen J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):3853-9. PubMed ID: 24180794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Absolute pitch in Costa Rica: Distribution of pitch identification ability and implications for its genetic basis.
    Chavarria-Soley G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Aug; 140(2):891. PubMed ID: 27586721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre.
    Krumhansl CL; Iverson P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):739-51. PubMed ID: 1500873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Activation in the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule Reflects the Representation of Musical Structure beyond Simple Pitch Discrimination.
    Royal I; Vuvan DT; Zendel BR; Robitaille N; Schönwiesner M; Peretz I
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155291. PubMed ID: 27195523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binaural localization of musical pitch using interaural time differences in congenital amusia.
    Hsieh IH; Chen SC; Liu JW
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204397. PubMed ID: 30240453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attending to pitch information inhibits processing of pitch information: the curious case of amusia.
    Zendel BR; Lagrois MÉ; Robitaille N; Peretz I
    J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(9):3815-24. PubMed ID: 25740512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interference in memory for tonal pitch: implications for a working-memory model.
    Pechmann T; Mohr G
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 1508056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing.
    Marmel F; Perrin F; Tillmann B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3095-104. PubMed ID: 21265601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developmental changes in the perception of pitch contour: distinguishing up from down.
    Stalinski SM; Schellenberg EG; Trehub SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Sep; 124(3):1759-63. PubMed ID: 19045665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pitch expertise is not created equal: Cross-domain effects of musicianship and tone language experience on neural and behavioural discrimination of speech and music.
    Hutka S; Bidelman GM; Moreno S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():52-63. PubMed ID: 25797590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Individual differences in absolute pitch performance: Contributions of working memory, musical expertise, and tonal language background.
    Van Hedger SC; Nusbaum HC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():251-260. PubMed ID: 30347313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Mel Scale's disqualifying bias and a consistency of pitch-difference equisections in 1956 with equal cochlear distances and equal frequency ratios.
    Greenwood DD
    Hear Res; 1997 Jan; 103(1-2):199-224. PubMed ID: 9007585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context.
    Krumhansl CL; Shepard RN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):579-94. PubMed ID: 528960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Superoptimal Perceptual Integration Suggests a Place-Based Representation of Pitch at High Frequencies.
    Lau BK; Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
    J Neurosci; 2017 Sep; 37(37):9013-9021. PubMed ID: 28821642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A cochlear implant user with exceptional musical hearing ability.
    Maarefvand M; Marozeau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):424-32. PubMed ID: 23509878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: an MEG study.
    Brattico E; Pallesen KJ; Varyagina O; Bailey C; Anourova I; Järvenpää M; Eerola T; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2230-44. PubMed ID: 18855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Musical imagery: generation of tones and chords.
    Hubbard TL; Stoeckig K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Oct; 14(4):656-67. PubMed ID: 2972802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The MuSIC perception test: a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users.
    Brockmeier SJ; Fitzgerald D; Searle O; Fitzgerald H; Grasmeder M; Hilbig S; Vermiere K; Peterreins M; Heydner S; Arnold W
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21756454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Musical duplex perception: perception of figurally good chords with subliminal distinguishing tones.
    Hall MD; Pastore RE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):752-62. PubMed ID: 1500874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.