These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5895)

  • 1. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial.
    Kelso IM; Parsons RJ; Lawrence GF; Arora SS; Edmonds DK; Cooke ID
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 677195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Haverkamp AD; Orleans M; Langendoerfer S; McFee J; Murphy J; Thompson HE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jun; 134(4):399-412. PubMed ID: 453276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal monitoring: its effect on the perinatal mortality and cesarean section rates and its complications.
    Tutera G; Newman RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Jul; 122(6):750-4. PubMed ID: 1155516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of unselected intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Lee WK; Baggish MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1976 May; 47(5):516-20. PubMed ID: 1264397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies.
    Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    McCrann DJ; Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1974 Sep; 1(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 4470056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome.
    Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal distress and the condition of newborn infants.
    Sykes GS; Molloy PM; Johnson P; Stirrat GM; Turnbull AC
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Oct; 287(6397):943-5. PubMed ID: 6412897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intermittent versus continuous electronic monitoring in labour: a randomised study.
    Herbst A; Ingemarsson I
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Aug; 101(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 7947499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation: a meta-analysis.
    Vintzileos AM; Nochimson DJ; Guzman ER; Knuppel RA; Lake M; Schifrin BS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jan; 85(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 7800313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fetal monitoring polemic.
    Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 6749379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intensive care in labour. Simultaneous fetal heart monitoring and fetal scalp sampling in 83 patients.
    Hartley DR
    S Afr Med J; 1974 Oct; 48(50):2113-8. PubMed ID: 4428288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Routine electronic monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine activity during labor.
    Shenker L; Post RC; Seiler JS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Aug; 46(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 1153149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical significance of fetal heart rate patterns during labor. I. Baseline patterns.
    Cibils LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):290-305. PubMed ID: 1275022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical validity and practicality of combined surveillance of labor.
    Mandruzzato GP; Spanio P; Carlomagno G; Tondi M
    Contrib Gynecol Obstet; 1977; 3():7-13. PubMed ID: 15792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of a trial of labor with a positive contraction stress test.
    Bissonnette JM; Johnson K; Toomey C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 135(3):292-6. PubMed ID: 484615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence on clinical practice of routine intra-partum fetal monitoring.
    Edington PT; Sibanda J; Beard RW
    Br Med J; 1975 Aug; 3(5979):341-3. PubMed ID: 239781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor.
    Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.