These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Parallel processing of information about location in the amygdala, entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. Gaskin S; White NM Hippocampus; 2013 Nov; 23(11):1075-83. PubMed ID: 23929819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatial conditional discrimination learning in developing rats. Brown KL; Pagani JH; Stanton ME Dev Psychobiol; 2005 Mar; 46(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 15732054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of fimbria-fornix, hippocampus, and amygdala lesions on discrimination between proximal locations. Chai SC; White NM Behav Neurosci; 2004 Aug; 118(4):770-84. PubMed ID: 15301603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operant stimulus control applied to maze behavior. II. Positive reinforcement of discrimination reversal in rats. Davidson RS Psychol Rep; 1968 Jun; 22(3):1237-42. PubMed ID: 5665803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dorsal hippocampus function in learning and expressing a spatial discrimination. White NM; Gaskin S Learn Mem; 2006; 13(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 16585789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EFFECTS OF POSTRESPONSE STIMULUS DURATION UPON DISCRIMINATION LEARNING IN HUMAN SUBJECTS. DICKERSON DJ; ELLIS NR J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():528-33. PubMed ID: 14285610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Partial reinforcement effect under odor control. Prytula RE; Bridges CC; Anderson HR; Hayes LC Psychol Rep; 1972 Feb; 30(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 5012623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus adaptation as an alternative to latent learning. Haraway MM; Bailey WN; Maples EG Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):1067-72. PubMed ID: 5139341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of stimulus intensity on the efficacy of reinforcement in differentiatiion training. ZieliĆski K Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1965; 25(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 5887967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects. Spear NE; Pavlik WB J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. Bower G; McLean J; Meacham J J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Oct; 62(2):184-92. PubMed ID: 5969596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DIFFERENCES IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND VERBALIZATION OF THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. MARTIN RB; DEAN SJ Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():235-40. PubMed ID: 14283969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning. Jenkins HM Psychol Bull; 1965 Nov; 64(5):365-76. PubMed ID: 5851543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting discrimination learning from differential conditioning with amount of reinforcement as a variable. Champion RA; Smith LR J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 5909078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of behavioral paradigm on auditory discrimination learning: a literature review. Burdick CK J Aud Res; 1979 Jan; 19(1):59-82. PubMed ID: 121733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Successive reversals of a classically conditioned heart-rate discrimination. Tighe TJ; Graves DM; Riley CA J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 5645880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. RETARDATE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING FOLLOWING DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING OF THE CHOICE-POINT STIMULI. EIMAS PD; SHEPP BE Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():685-93. PubMed ID: 14203804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Group behavior of rats under schedules of reinforcement. Grott R; Neuringer A J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Sep; 22(2):311-21. PubMed ID: 4413600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]