These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5909078)

  • 1. Predicting discrimination learning from differential conditioning with amount of reinforcement as a variable.
    Champion RA; Smith LR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 5909078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DELAY OF VERBAL REWARD IN VERBAL CONDITIONING AND SELECTIVE LEARNING.
    WEISS RF
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():857-61. PubMed ID: 14303017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A TEST OF A DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS OF SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT.
    MYERS NA; MYERS JL
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():98-101. PubMed ID: 14315138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. RELATION BETWEEN STIMULUS INTENSITY AND OPERANT RESPONSE RATE AS A FUNCTION OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND DRIVE.
    GRAY JA
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():9-24. PubMed ID: 14256256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A neural model of attention, reinforcement and discrimination learning.
    Grossberg S
    Int Rev Neurobiol; 1975; 18():263-327. PubMed ID: 1107246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE EFFECT OF RATIO OF REINFORCEMENT ON PERFORMANCE IN SELECTIVE LEARNING BY CHILDREN.
    DAS JP; SAHU G; PANDA TP
    Br J Psychol; 1965 Aug; 56():289-94. PubMed ID: 14340126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditions affecting acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential reward.
    Mitchell KM; Perkins NP; Perkins CC
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Dec; 60(3):435-7. PubMed ID: 5839270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD.
    SEMLER IJ
    Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects.
    Spear NE; Pavlik WB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EFFECT OF STRENGTH OF DRIVE DETERMINED BY A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR APPETITIVE CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF RATS.
    DEBOLD RC; MILLER NE; JENSEN DD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Feb; 59():102-8. PubMed ID: 14282384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response-chain learning of mentally retarded adolescents under four conditions of reinforcement.
    Talkington LW
    Am J Ment Defic; 1971 Nov; 76(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 5148363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer of Pavlovian differential conditioning to an operant discrimination.
    Mellgren RL; Ost JW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Mar; 67(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 5787390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PERCEPTION, DRIVE, AND BEHAVIOR THEORY.
    ZAJONC RB; DORFMAN DD
    Psychol Rev; 1964 Jul; 71():273-90. PubMed ID: 14183612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theory meets pigeons: the influence of reward-magnitude on discrimination-learning.
    Rose J; Schmidt R; Grabemann M; Güntürkün O
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Mar; 198(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 19041347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. THE INFLUENCE OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD ON THE AVERSIVE PROPERTIES OF ANTICIPATORY FRUSTRATION.
    AMSEL A; SURRIDGE CT
    Can J Psychol; 1964 Dec; 18():321-7. PubMed ID: 14258395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RETARDATE DISCRIMINATION LEARNING FOLLOWING DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING OF THE CHOICE-POINT STIMULI.
    EIMAS PD; SHEPP BE
    Child Dev; 1964 Sep; 35():685-93. PubMed ID: 14203804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MULTIDIMENSIONAL STIMULUS DIFFERENCES IN DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND VERBALIZATION OF THE REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY.
    MARTIN RB; DEAN SJ
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Feb; 16():235-40. PubMed ID: 14283969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. DIFFERENTIAL EYELID CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF THE FREQUENCY AND INTENSITY OF AUDITORY CSS.
    MOORE JW
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Sep; 68():250-9. PubMed ID: 14215423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect on retardate discrimination learning of various stimuli associated with reward.
    Denegre J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 Mar; 3(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 5910571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.