These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5909088)

  • 1. Stimulus similarity and the effect of reinforcement in a pseudo-concept identification task.
    Shaffer JP; Remple RK
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 5909088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Number of dimensions, stimulus constancy, and reinforcement in a pseudo concept-identification task.
    Cotton JW; Shanab ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1968 Mar; 76(3):464-7. PubMed ID: 5642160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of concept formation as a function of reinforcement and stimulus generalization.
    BUSS AH
    J Exp Psychol; 1950 Aug; 40(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 15436945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ON THE DIFFERENT EFFECTS OF RANDOM REINFORCEMENT AND PRESOLUTION REVERSAL ON HUMAN CONCEPT IDENTIFICATION.
    HOLSTEIN SB; PREMACK D
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Sep; 70():335-7. PubMed ID: 14343265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
    Astley SL; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intermittent reinforcement, nonreversal shifts, and neutralizing in concept formation.
    GORMEZANO I; ABRAHAM FD
    J Exp Psychol; 1961 Jan; 61():1-6. PubMed ID: 13707279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reversal and nonreversal shifts in concept formation with partial reinforcement eliminated.
    BUSS AH
    J Exp Psychol; 1956 Sep; 52(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 13357698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supplementary report maintenance of a previously learned concept as a function of partial reinforcement.
    BUSS AH
    J Exp Psychol; 1959 Nov; 58():414-5. PubMed ID: 13806425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative effectiveness of different reinforcement combinations on concept learning of children at two developmental levels.
    MEYER WJ; SEIDMAN SB
    Child Dev; 1961 Mar; 32():117-27. PubMed ID: 13770023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of locus of reinforcement control on a concept-identification task.
    Litrownik AJ; Franzini LR; Skenderian D
    Psychol Rep; 1976 Aug; 39(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 959444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preference for a positive evaluative response in concept learning.
    Rhine RJ
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):632-5. PubMed ID: 5839519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PROBABILITY LEARNING IN THE T MAZE WITH NONCORRECTION.
    WEINSTOCK S; NORTH AJ; BRODY AL; LOGUIDICE J
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():76-81. PubMed ID: 14334247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing reversal and nonreversal shifts in concept formation with partial reinforcement controlled.
    HARROW M; FRIEDMAN GB
    J Exp Psychol; 1958 Jun; 55(6):592-8. PubMed ID: 13563775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of orientation and differential reinforcement on transitive stimulus control.
    Amd M; de Almeida JH; de Rose JC; Silveira CC; Pompermaier HM
    Behav Processes; 2017 Nov; 144():58-65. PubMed ID: 28927963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extinction after partial reinforcement and minimal learning as a test of both verbal control and PRE in concept learning.
    O'Connell DC; Wagner MV
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Jan; 73(1):151-3. PubMed ID: 6031658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. OBSERVING RESPONSE AND WORD ASSOCIATION IN CONCEPT SHIFTS: TWO-CHOICE AND FOUR-CHOICE SELECTIVE LEARNING.
    LACHMAN R; MEEHAN JT; BRADLEY R
    J Psychol; 1965 Mar; 59():349-57. PubMed ID: 14296323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NONREINFORCEMENTS OF PERCEPTUAL AND MEDIATING RESPONSES IN CONCEPT LEARNING.
    KENDLER HH; WOERNER M
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():591-2. PubMed ID: 14155424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concept learning without differential reinforcement in pigeons by means of contextual cueing.
    Couto KC; Navarro VM; Smith TR; Wasserman EA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 26914972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RTT PARADIGM: NO PANACEA FOR THEORIES OF ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING.
    SEIDEL RJ
    Psychol Rev; 1963 Nov; 70():565-72. PubMed ID: 14057305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability matching in concept identification.
    Grier JB; Bornstein R
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 5908811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.