These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5912833)

  • 1. Differentiation of response duration.
    Harris AH; Farmer J; Schoenfeld WN
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):619-25. PubMed ID: 5912833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conditioning response variability.
    Schoenfeld WN; Harris AH; Farmer J
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):551-7. PubMed ID: 5912818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response rate and conditioned suppression.
    Blackman D
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Dec; 19(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 5981066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of response pacing on conditioned suppression.
    Blackman D
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1967 May; 19(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 6043057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lack of instrumental conditioning with intragastric reinforcement in normal experimental procedure.
    Cytawa J; Luszawska D; Schoenborn R; Zajac M
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1972; 32(4):767-72. PubMed ID: 4660608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance after reinforcement and nonreinforcement in a partial reinforcement situation.
    McCain G
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Oct; 19(2):402. PubMed ID: 5912800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. THE SUCCESSIVE DIFFERENTIATION OF A LEVER DISPLACEMENT RESPONSE. NADC-MA-6307.
    HERRICK RM
    NADC MA United States Nav Air Dev Cen Johnsville Pa Aviat Med Accel Lab; 1963 Jul; 53():1-29. PubMed ID: 14131292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus discrimination through intracranial reinforcement.
    Wolff PC; Burnstein DD; Flory RK; Mabry J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Jun; 22(3):891-5. PubMed ID: 5963119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subject control of reinforcement density on an interval schedule.
    Meltzer D; Merkler NL; Maxey GC
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Aug; 17(1):183-6. PubMed ID: 5826470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of withdrawal of reinforcement within the escape-avoidance paradigm.
    Kaufman A; Baron A
    Psychol Rep; 1966 Dec; 19(3):959-65. PubMed ID: 5981108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some effects of correlation between response-contingent shock and reinforcement.
    Murray M; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 May; 10(3):301-9. PubMed ID: 6056803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a conditioned reinforcer.
    Burnstein D
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):1170. PubMed ID: 5139355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditioned reinforcement using brain stimulation as a primary reinforcement.
    Bergquist EH; Joseph JA
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Aug; 31(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 5055907
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EXPERIMENTAL EXTINCTION IN LEARNING AND MEMORY.
    BUNCH ME
    J Gen Psychol; 1963 Oct; 69():275-91. PubMed ID: 14057089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hippocampal lesions and the partial reinforcement effect.
    Bloom JM; McFarlain RA
    Psychol Rep; 1971 Dec; 29(3):831-7. PubMed ID: 5124166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Training a new response using conditioned reinforcement.
    Sosa R; dos Santos CV; Flores C
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jun; 87(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 21458545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response acquisition with immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement.
    Snycerski S; Laraway S; Poling A
    Behav Processes; 2005 Jan; 68(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of stimulus intensity on the efficacy of reinforcement in differentiatiion training.
    Zieliński K
    Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1965; 25(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 5887967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Naloxone decreases responding for conditioned reinforcement in rats.
    Rudski J
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Feb; 100(1):263-9. PubMed ID: 17451034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiac rate of the rat under a DRL and a non-contingent temporal schedule of reinforcement.
    Snapper AG; Schoenfeld WN; Ferraro DP; Locke B
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Oct; 17(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 5833739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.