These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 592087)
1. Perception of hostility in the TAT as a function of defensive style. O'Gorman JG; Stair LH J Pers Assess; 1977 Dec; 41(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 592087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A study of the repression-sensitization dimension in the Thematic Apperception Test]. Kimura N Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1983 Jun; 54(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6674668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hostility on the TAT as a function of defensive inhibition and stimulus situation. Megargee EI J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Aug; 31(4):73-9. PubMed ID: 4383008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Repression-sensitization, stress, and perception of pain in others. Von Baeyer C Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Aug; 55(1):315-20. PubMed ID: 7133920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between repression-sensitization and word frequency estimates for pleasant and unpleasant words. Matlin MW; Derby PL Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):351-4. PubMed ID: 662532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of aggressive and nonaggressive rock songs on projective and structured tests. Wanamaker CE; Reznikoff M J Psychol; 1989 Nov; 123(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 2607484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hostility of asocial youth as measured by the TAT and Rorschach. Kalliopuska M Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Apr; 74(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 1594417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repression, hostility, and autonomic recovery from a laboratory stressor. Linden W; Long BC J Clin Hypertens; 1987 Dec; 3(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 3453390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of the repression-sensitization scales to anxiety. Slough N; Kleinknecht RA; Thorndike RM J Pers Assess; 1984 Aug; 48(4):378-9. PubMed ID: 6481600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of stimulus, background, personality, and scoring system on the manifestation of hostility on the TAT. Murstein BI J Consult Clin Psychol; 1968 Jun; 32(3):355-365. PubMed ID: 5666134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of cue relevance, ambiguity, and self-reported hostility on TAT responses. Kaplan MF J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Dec; 31(6):45-50. PubMed ID: 6081922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Repression and sensitization as determinants of responses to a message designed to arouse thoughts of one's own death. Schulman KR Psychol Rep; 1976 Aug; 39(1):189-90. PubMed ID: 959447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a projective measure of aggression-anxiety for five-year-old boys. Henry RM J Pers Assess; 1981 Aug; 45(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 7264860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differences in motives between Millennial and Generation X medical students. Borges NJ; Manuel RS; Elam CL; Jones BJ Med Educ; 2010 Jun; 44(6):570-6. PubMed ID: 20604853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PROJECTION OF HOSTILITY ON THE TAT AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS, BACKGROUND, AND PERSONALITY VARIABLES. MURSTEIN BI J Consult Psychol; 1965 Feb; 29():43-8. PubMed ID: 14277397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between behavioral indices of aggression and hostile content on the TAT. Matranga JT J Pers Assess; 1976 Apr; 40(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 957083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]