135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5921858)
1. The physician and the jury.
Chayet NL
N Engl J Med; 1966 Dec; 275(22):1242-3. PubMed ID: 5921858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Observations on the adversary system and the role of the forensic scientist: "scientific truth" v. "legal truth".
Pollack S
J Forensic Sci; 1973 Jul; 18(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 4782656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
Weimar W
Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical testimony involving an alleged ruptured disc--the direct and cross-examination of the defendant's orthopedic surgeon.
Med Trial Tech Q; 1977; 23(4):437-80. PubMed ID: 875694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A defense viewpoint on jury selection in medical malpractice cases.
Trager L
Med Trial Tech Q; 1981; 27(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 7253849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Forensic Medical Science: The continued problems of judges and juries.
Curran WJ
N Engl J Med; 1976 May; 294(19):1042-3. PubMed ID: 1256513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of forensic medicine and dentistry.
Woolridge ED
Dent Clin North Am; 1977 Jan; 21(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 319030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Signs, marks, and private parts: doctors, legal discourses, and evidence of rape in the United States, 1823-1930.
Robertson S
J Hist Sex; 1998 Jan; 8(3):345-88. PubMed ID: 11620018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Legal aspects of neurologic practice.
Beresford HR
Contemp Neurol Ser; 1975; 13():3-150. PubMed ID: 1234042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Private forensic toxicology: the adversary system.
Kier LC
Clin Toxicol; 1977; 10(2):185-208. PubMed ID: 852241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Letter: Physician's civil-law liability when acting as a forensic medicine expert in cases of erroneous testimony].
Jessnitzer K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Mar; 99(11):542. PubMed ID: 4835520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Law and the surgeon.
Norton ML
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1972 May; 134(5):851-8. PubMed ID: 5064082
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reasonable medical certainty.
Rappeport JR
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 3995190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Rejection of a forensic expert because of a private opinion given by him earlier].
Jessnitzer K
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1973 Nov; 98(48):2315-6. PubMed ID: 4762832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [From court medicine to forensic medicine].
Bär W
Ther Umsch; 1997 May; 54(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 9244989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Legal problems concerned with forensic stomatological expert testimony].
Svadkovskiĭ BS
Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1972; 51(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 4500926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The general pathologist and the medicolegal autopsy.
Taylor HL
Arch Pathol; 1974 Dec; 98(6):426-9. PubMed ID: 4608164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigative searches in criminal law.
Holder AR
JAMA; 1974 Nov; 230(6):898-9. PubMed ID: 4479583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Expert testimony in acts committed during affective disturbances].
Schirmer S
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1969 Jul; 21(7):256-62. PubMed ID: 5345165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Expert testimony on wounds in maxillo-facial and front-ethmoidal region in forensic medicine].
Cvetnić V
Med Glas; 1971 Jun; 25(6):237-9. PubMed ID: 5148034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
