These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 59223)

  • 1. Letter: Outpatient follow-up.
    Strube G
    Lancet; 1976 Jul; 2(7977):151. PubMed ID: 59223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter: Anglo-American contrasts in general practice.
    Br Med J; 1976 Jun; 1(6025):1590. PubMed ID: 1276780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter: Outpatient follow-up.
    Fowler AW
    Lancet; 1976 Jun; 1(7974):1409-10. PubMed ID: 59046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Letter: Outpatient follow-up.
    Loudon IS
    Lancet; 1976 Jul; 2(7975):37. PubMed ID: 59089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice.
    Southgate L; Pringle M
    BMJ; 1999 Oct; 319(7218):1180-3. PubMed ID: 10541513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tighter control on GPs to follow doctor's murder convictions.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2000 Feb; 320(7231):331. PubMed ID: 10657310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The United Kingdom tries pay for performance.
    Manag Care Interface; 2004 Nov; 17(11):64-5. PubMed ID: 15573805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of UK national guidelines on services to treat patients with acute low back pain: follow up questionnaire survey.
    Barnett AG; Underwood MR; Vickers MR
    BMJ; 1999 Apr; 318(7188):919-20. PubMed ID: 10102859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Setting up consensus standards for the care of patients in general practice.
    Farmer A
    Br J Gen Pract; 1991 Apr; 41(345):135-6. PubMed ID: 1854530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. After baby P: can GPs follow child protection guidance?
    Learner S
    BMJ; 2011 Mar; 342():d707. PubMed ID: 21367842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. History catches up with the GP.
    Corbett J
    Health Serv J; 1987 Nov; 97(5078):1383. PubMed ID: 10285347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Better general practice.
    Lancet; 1985 Jan; 1(8421):166. PubMed ID: 2857239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audit in general practice.
    Houghton G
    BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6777):660. PubMed ID: 2012890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pay-for-performance programs in the United Kingdom.
    Tahrani AA; Varughese GI; Macleod AF
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Oct; 355(17):1832-3; author reply 1833. PubMed ID: 17073001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Good general practice.
    Whitney JD
    Br Med J; 1979 Feb; 1(6161):492-3. PubMed ID: 427436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reaccrediting general practice.
    Gray DP
    BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6852):488-9. PubMed ID: 1392992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The measurement of practice.
    Parry KM
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Apr; 37(297):145-6. PubMed ID: 3694568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audit in general practice.
    Metcalfe DH
    BMJ; 1989 Nov; 299(6711):1293-4. PubMed ID: 2513924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pay-for-performance programs in the United Kingdom.
    Sanderson AA
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Oct; 355(17):1832; author reply 1833. PubMed ID: 17065649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditing and evaluation in general practice.
    Mourin K
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Oct; 26(171):726-33. PubMed ID: 1003383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.