These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5924915)
1. A vertical movable recipromatic Potter-Bucky diaphragm mounted on a spot-film tower. Its advantages when used with a ceiling-mounted x-ray tube. MacMoran JW; Konopka AJ; Barton RT; Young BR; Funch RB; Bernhard RA Radiology; 1966 Nov; 87(5):948-9. PubMed ID: 5924915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Potter-Bucky diaphragm. HAUPT OF Xray Tech; 1946 Mar; 17(5):434-6. PubMed ID: 21000831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. An evaluation of an automated radiographic table. Thompson TT; Key JF; Radford EL Radiology; 1975 Apr; 115(1):223-4. PubMed ID: 1118609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Modern x-ray apparatus for pediatric radiology (Pädiatrix) (author's transl)]. Rebien W; Willich E; Marks G Radiologe; 1982 Feb; 22(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 7071329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Construction of a new Potter-Bucky screen]. SVOBODA M; BESPERAT V Cesk Rentgenol; 1958 Mar; 12(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 13537118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The "swinging" tube: a new concept. Amplatz K; Moore R; Korbuly D Radiology; 1978 Sep; 128(3):783-5. PubMed ID: 674654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Analysis of the advantages of digital X-ray apparatuses over film X-ray apparatuses]. Elinson MB Med Tekh; 2005; (5):37-9. PubMed ID: 16285246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study. Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reciprocating Bucky for serial film changers. Becker JA; Heiferman S Radiology; 1977 Oct; 125(1):250. PubMed ID: 897180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Reduction of patient exposure with X-ray TV by means of an automatic diaphragm (Servo-diaphragm) of X-ray tube; evaluation based on measurement of the area-exposure integral]. Koga S; Takeuchi A; Suzuki R; Shima I Rinsho Hoshasen; 1976 Oct; 21(11):1005-7. PubMed ID: 1034057 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Extrafocal radiation of medical x-ray tubes with a rotating anode]. Juran R; Hinz R Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990; 31(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 2343094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The ARS "RUTA" x-ray unit]. Denisov VV; Fikhman ID; Chuliukov GI Med Tekh; 1989; (2):58-61. PubMed ID: 2747503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mobile radiotranslucent litter-table with bucky diaphragm. HAMMERSCHLAG R; POPPEL MH; STEIN J J Am Med Assoc; 1956 Sep; 162(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 13357314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A uniform focal spot X-ray tube with improved MTF and kW rating. Matsui H; Ono K Radiology; 1985 Jul; 156(1):227-30. PubMed ID: 4001411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mechanical structure design of over tubetable remote control diagnostic X-ray unit model X08]. Ling H Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 1997 Sep; 21(5):250-3, 262. PubMed ID: 11189269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of the x-ray tube, film and foil on the quality of the picture]. Lissner JA Rontgenpraxis; 1969 Jan; 22(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 5801166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sources of artifacts in rotational scanography. Moore R; Korbuly D; Kotula F; Castaneda-Zuniga W; Amplatz K Rofo; 1982 Sep; 137(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 6216162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Testing the characteristics of X-ray apparatuses by using test cassette]. Shengeliia NA Med Tekh; 2001; (6):39-42. PubMed ID: 11837196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]