These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 592546)

  • 1. [Effects of pulse height and pulse width on the magnitude sensation of electrocutaneous stimulus (author's transl)].
    Tachi S; Tanie K; Abe M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1977 Sep; 15(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 592546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electric pulse frequency and magnitude of perceived sensation during electrocutaneous forearm stimulation.
    Jelinek HF; McIntyre R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Sep; 91(9):1378-82. PubMed ID: 20801255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intermittent stimulation delays adaptation to electrocutaneous sensory feedback.
    Buma DG; Buitenweg JR; Veltink PH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):435-41. PubMed ID: 17894276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms.
    Kaczmarek KA; Webster JG; Radwin RG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Jul; 39(7):701-15. PubMed ID: 1516937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrocutaneous nerve stimulation-II: stimulus waveform selection.
    Bütikofer R; Lawrence PD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1979 Feb; 26(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 761934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Szeto AY
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1985; 13(5):373-83. PubMed ID: 4073624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of 50 Hz current threshold of electrocutaneous sensations using different methods.
    Lindenblatt G; Silny J
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Dec; 7(12):933-46. PubMed ID: 17111461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Study of the non-acoustic stapedius reflex elicited by electrocutaneous stimulation (author's transl)].
    Hohjyo K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1979 Jul; 82(7):689-701. PubMed ID: 536879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pattern identification as a function of stimulation current on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Sep; 11(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 14518790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pattern identification and perceived stimulus quality as a function of stimulation waveform on a fingertip-scanned electrotactile display.
    Kaczmarek KA; Haase SJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2003 Mar; 11(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12797720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrocutaneous feedback for artificial limbs. Summary progress report. February 1, 1974, through July 31, 1975.
    Prior RE; Lyman J
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):3-37. PubMed ID: 1227686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Receptive field characteristics under electrotactile stimulation of the fingertip.
    Warren JP; Bobich LR; Santello M; Sweeney JD; Tillery SI
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2008 Aug; 16(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 18713678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mechanically evoked somatosensory potentials].
    Oikawa T; Fujitani Y
    No To Shinkei; 1985 Sep; 37(9):861-70. PubMed ID: 3904787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering.
    Szeto AY; Saunders FA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1982 Apr; 29(4):300-8. PubMed ID: 7068167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Electrocutaneous information transmission system using stimulus energy control device (author's transl)].
    Tanie K; Tachi S; Komoriya K; Abe M; Miura M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1980 Feb; 18(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 7463847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals.
    Szeto AY; Chung YM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1986; 14(4):369-81. PubMed ID: 3752640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of tolterodine on bladder-filling sensations and perception thresholds to intravesical electrical stimulation: method and initial results.
    Boy S; Schurch B; Mehnert U; Mehring G; Karsenty G; Reitz A
    BJU Int; 2007 Sep; 100(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 17669142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Somatosensory evoked potential in the hypnotic state and in hypnotic analgesia (author's transl)].
    Vacek J; Cerný M; Strelecková J; Dolezalová V
    Sb Lek; 1981; 83(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 7209365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [On the transformation of the deformed pulse through the living tissue to the original pulse (author's transl)].
    Matumoto M; Hanba M; Kitamura T; Hanba S
    Nihon Seirigaku Zasshi; 1973 Jul; 35(7):347-54. PubMed ID: 4797074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in sensitivity to transient electrocutaneous stimulation.
    Larkin WD; Reilly JP; Kittler LB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1986 May; 33(5):495-504. PubMed ID: 3710505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.