These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Evaluation of the condition of newborn infants delivered by obstetrical forceps and vacuum extraction]. Gajewska E; Wachnik D; Orlik-Adamska S Ginekol Pol; 1985 Feb; 56(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 4043787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Macular hole in a newborn associated with forceps delivery. Casillas M; Bazard MC; Hubert I; Berrod JP J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2010 Dec; 47 Online():e1-3. PubMed ID: 21175117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Obstetrical vacuum-extractor and forceps. Indications and effects on the newborn infants]. Bonfadini Bossi E; Rella R; Fagnani D; Salini P; Console V; Onofri MP; Pezzoli G Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Apr; 32(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 7383439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Our experience in the use of forceps and vacuum extractor]. Avezzú G; Giannone R Minerva Ginecol; 1973 Jan; 25(1):33-45. PubMed ID: 4696914 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after first vaginal delivery using Thierry's spatulas. Mazouni C; Bretelle F; Collette E; Heckenroth H; Bonnier P; Gamerre M Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 16171477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Perinatal problems and the role of the vacuum-extractor in the delivery department in a central hospital]. Rossavik IK Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1971 Jun; 91(18):1389-91. PubMed ID: 5568059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Immediate and remote outcome of vacuum extraction and use of obstetrical forceps]. Mishina EA; Penchenko EV Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1975 May; (5):72. PubMed ID: 1220579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Connexions between instrumental delivery and cerebral damage in the infant (author's transl)]. Naske R; Poustka F; Presslich O; Schubert H; Zapotoczky HG; Altmann P; Schaller A Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1976 May; 88(10):319-24. PubMed ID: 997523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forceps: towards obsolescence or revival? Dietz HP Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Apr; 94(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 25625336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Experiences with the use of a personal model of the vacuum extractor]. Nowosad K; Reszczyński A; Weinbrenner L; Krzaklewski S Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 Feb; 92(6):185-8. PubMed ID: 5523034 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps. Meyer L; Mailloux J; Marcoux S; Blanchet P; Meyer F Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1987; 66(7):643-7. PubMed ID: 3439447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]