These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

55 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 594352)

  • 1. An evaluation of some screen film combinations for use in radiography of the extremities.
    Goodman DA; Wells CA; Weston PJ
    Radiography; 1977 Nov; 43(515):253-5. PubMed ID: 594352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imaging factors for xeroradiography of the extremities.
    Spencer JD; Hill ID
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Jan; 52(613):51-5. PubMed ID: 427352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the C-arm image of small bones.
    Waldron VD
    Orthop Rev; 1992 Jul; 21(7):887-8. PubMed ID: 1501928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Criteria for choosing the screen-film system in x-ray diagnosis (author's transl)].
    Piorico D; Bacarini L; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 1978 Feb; 64(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 684255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new asymmetric screen-film combination for conventional chest radiography: evaluation in 50 patients.
    Swensen SJ; Gray JE; Brown LR; Aughenbaugh GL; Harms GF; Stears J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):483-6. PubMed ID: 8430540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image enhancement using computed radiography.
    Long BW
    Radiol Technol; 1990; 61(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 2326438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance tests for mammographic film-screen combinations: use of absolute techniques.
    Bor D; Akdur K
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2013; 19(5):360-70. PubMed ID: 23603122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Physical aspects of photostimulable phosphor computed radiography.
    Cowen AR; Workman A; Price JS
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Apr; 66(784):332-45. PubMed ID: 8495288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [On the problem of the use of film-screen combinations consisting only of film and back screen instead of film without screens (author's transl)].
    Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1977; 18(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 905555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental evaluation of screen-film combinations for intraoral panoramic radiography.
    Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 3470222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a gradient intensifying screen for scoliosis radiography.
    Ritter EM; Wright CE; Fritz SL; Kirchmer NA; De Smet AA
    Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):230-2. PubMed ID: 7360970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of several rare-earth film-screen systems.
    Braun M; Wilson BC
    Radiology; 1982 Sep; 144(4):915-9. PubMed ID: 7111746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.