These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5945070)

  • 1. Feedback and infralogical strategies in invariant area conceptulization.
    Beilin H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1966 Jun; 3(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 5945070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Logic in infancy.
    Langer J
    Cognition; 1981; 10(1-3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7198535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.
    Evans JS; Barston JL; Pollard P
    Mem Cognit; 1983 May; 11(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 6621345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concept conservation under positively and negatively evaluated transformations.
    Saltz E; Hamilton H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1968 Mar; 6(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 5642133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cognitive development in childhood. What is really developing?].
    Weinert FE
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1985 Jun; 133(6):421-5. PubMed ID: 4047057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is psychological essentialism an inherent feature of human cognition?
    Olivola CY; Machery E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):499. PubMed ID: 25388047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Logical knowledge and cue redundancy in deductive reasoning.
    Hoch SJ; Tschirgi JE
    Mem Cognit; 1985 Sep; 13(5):453-62. PubMed ID: 4088055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Author's reply: refining and expanding the proposal of an inherence heuristic in human understanding.
    Cimpian A; Salomon E
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):506-27. PubMed ID: 25548815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The inherence heuristic is inherent in humans.
    Hampton JA
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):490-1. PubMed ID: 25388037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The essence of essentialism?
    Haslam N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):491-2. PubMed ID: 25388038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Babies' logic activity: a differential study].
    Escolano Pérez E; Sastre i Riba S
    Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):537-43. PubMed ID: 17296084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quiddity and haecceity as distinct forms of essentialism.
    Hood B
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):492-3. PubMed ID: 25388039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The representation of inherent properties.
    Prasada S
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):500. PubMed ID: 25388048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can the inherence heuristic explain vitalistic reasoning?
    Bastian B
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):482-3. PubMed ID: 25388027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inherence is an aspect of psychological essentialism.
    Dennehy TC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):486-7. PubMed ID: 25388032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic revisions to inherent notions may shape improvements in cognitive infrastructure.
    Meleady R; Crisp RJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):495-6. PubMed ID: 25388043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The social aetiology of essentialist beliefs.
    O'Connor C; Joffe H
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):498-9. PubMed ID: 25388046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of learning strategy supporting transitive inference performance in humans compared to other species.
    Moses SN; Villate C; Ryan JD
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1370-87. PubMed ID: 16503340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do we need the inherence heuristic to explain the bias towards inherent explanations?
    Dunham Y
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):488-9. PubMed ID: 25388034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System-justifying motives can lead to both the acceptance and the rejection of innate explanations for group differences.
    Uhlmann EL; Zhu L; Brescoll VL; Newman GE
    Behav Brain Sci; 2014 Oct; 37(5):503-4. PubMed ID: 25388052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.