These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5960730)
1. Operating parameters and performance criteria for hemodialyzers and other membrane-separation devices. Michaels AS Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1966; 12():387-92. PubMed ID: 5960730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Progress in hemodialyzers and membranes--the last 20 years. Klein E Clin Nephrol; 1978 Apr; 9(4):131-7. PubMed ID: 348368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized data analysis of hemodialyzers by a standard protocol shows true effective membrane area. Mrava GL; Weber DC; Malchesky PS; Masuda K; Nosé Y Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1970; 16():155-63. PubMed ID: 4195318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of hemodialyzers and dialysis membranes. Report of a Study Group for the Artificial Kidney-Chronic Uremia Program NIAMDD-1977. Chapter two. In vitro characterization of hemodialyzers. Artif Organs; 1977 Nov; 1(2):59-77. PubMed ID: 616279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods for increasing the efficiency of a new dialyzer-membrane oxygenator. Landé AJ; Parker B; Subramanian V; Carlson RG; Lillehei CW Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1968; 14():227-32. PubMed ID: 5701535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Parameters affecting preparation of nylon-based hemodialysis membranes. Luttinger M; Cooper CW J Biomed Mater Res; 1970 Sep; 4(3):281-93. PubMed ID: 5469179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative performance characteristics of l3 hemodialyzers. Cestero VM; Freeman RB Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1969; 15():81-6. PubMed ID: 4978201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of automated devices for reprocessing hemodialyzers: intradialytic patient response. Deane N; Wineman RJ Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1984; 30():498-501. PubMed ID: 6533930 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Phosphate removal during dialysis--does the membrane matter? Ritz E Clin Nephrol; 1994 Jul; 42 Suppl 1():S57-60. PubMed ID: 7923986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Transport properties of a new dialysis membrane. Brauman SK; Fritzinger BK J Biomed Mater Res; 1971; 5(2):31-41. PubMed ID: 5575327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Twin Coil: performance and predictability. Lowrie EG; Hampers CL; Merrill JP Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1969; 15():60-4. PubMed ID: 5791431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In "vitro" evaluation of polycarbonate membrane for haemodialysis. Bionda A; Carmassi F; Donadio C; Palla R Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc; 1977; 14():618-20. PubMed ID: 600983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. History of hemodialyzers' designs. Twardowski ZJ Hemodial Int; 2008 Apr; 12(2):173-210. PubMed ID: 18394051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A practical point of reference for evaluation of mass transfer capacity of hemodialyzers. Sweeney MJ; Galletti PM Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1964; 10():3-10. PubMed ID: 5878450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanical sealing of tubular cellulose membranes for hemodialyzers. Mrava GL; Nosé Y J Biomed Mater Res; 1970 Mar; 4(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 5434810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients. Cheung AK; Greene T J Am Soc Nephrol; 2009 Mar; 20(3):462-4. PubMed ID: 19211709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics and comparative efficiencies of coil and parallel flow hemodialyzers. Freeman RB; Setter JG; Maher JF; Schreiner GE Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1964; 10():174-82. PubMed ID: 5878410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]