These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5962772)

  • 1. Some effects of light on sound intensity generalization as a function of number of training trials.
    Dorfman DD; Miller R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1966 Aug; 23(1):291-4. PubMed ID: 5962772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF A POSITIVE CONDITIONED REINFORCER. II. EFFECTS OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.
    THOMAS DR; CARONITE SC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Oct; 68():402-6. PubMed ID: 14216499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION IN THE ABSENCE OF DISCRIMINATION FACTORS.
    TOSTI DT; ELLIS HC
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():595-8. PubMed ID: 14241093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrical brain stimulation and food reinforcement in discrimination and generalization situations.
    Kling JW; Berkley MA
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Jun; 65(3):507-11. PubMed ID: 5667393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Free-operant compounding of variable-interval and low-rate discriminative stimuli.
    Weiss SJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Nov; 10(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 6080831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response patterning during stimulus generalization in the rat.
    Crites RJ; Harris RT; Rosenquist H; Thomas DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 Mar; 10(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 6032521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION ALONG THE DIMENSION OF ANGULARITY: A COMPARISON OF TRAINING PROCEDURES.
    NEWMAN FL; BARON MR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Aug; 60():59-63. PubMed ID: 14334244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. OPERANT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING AND STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AS A FUNCTION OF REWARD EXPOSURE.
    DICKSON JF; THOMAS DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1963 Oct; 56():829-33. PubMed ID: 14050168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A DISCRIMINATED-OPERANT BASELINE PROCEDURE FOR ANALYSIS OF STIMULUS GENERALIZATION IN INDIVIDUALS.
    ORLANDO R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():247-54. PubMed ID: 14286529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization.
    Switalski RW; Lyons J; Thomas DR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Nov; 72(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 5972005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The peak shift in stimulus generalization: equivalent effects of errors and noncontingent shock.
    Grusec T
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):239-49. PubMed ID: 5660704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A replication of Hoveland's study of generalization to frequencies of tone.
    Epstein S; Burstein KR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Nov; 72(5):782-4. PubMed ID: 5972022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus generalization and amount of prior training on variable-interval reinforcement.
    Hearst E; Koresko MB
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Aug; 66(1):133-8. PubMed ID: 5672619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AGE DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL-STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    CANESTRARI RE
    J Genet Psychol; 1965 Mar; 106():129-35. PubMed ID: 14273706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    MIGLER B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jul; 7(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 14176276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic generalization under continuous and partial reinforcement schedules.
    Cole S; Williams RL
    J Gen Psychol; 1968 Apr; 78(2d Half):267-73. PubMed ID: 5656909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regulation of attention to complex displays.
    Johnston WA; Howell WC; Zajkowski MM
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Mar; 73(3):481-2. PubMed ID: 6032557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual difference as a factor influencing generalization slope and discrimination learning.
    Hansen G; Miller JT; Thomas DR
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Dec; 77(3):456-62. PubMed ID: 5118254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MEDIATED STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND WORDS CONNOTING MOOD.
    MURRAY EN; BUSS AH
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1963 Dec; 67():586-93. PubMed ID: 14084767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse relationship between discriminability and stimulus generalization as a function of number of test stimuli.
    Marsh GD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1967 Oct; 64(2):284-9. PubMed ID: 6058219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.