These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 596409)

  • 1. Comparison of accommodation with rigid and flexible contact lenses.
    Carney LG; Woo GC
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1977 Sep; 54(9):595-7. PubMed ID: 596409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact lenses vs spectacles in myopes: is there any difference in accommodative and binocular function?
    Jiménez R; Martínez-Almeida L; Salas C; Ortíz C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 249(6):925-35. PubMed ID: 21104269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multifocal contact lens design, not addition power, affects accommodation responses in young adult myopes.
    Gifford KL; Schmid KL; Collins JM; Maher CB; Makan R; Nguyen E; Parmenter GB; Rolls BM; Zhang XS; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2021 Nov; 41(6):1346-1354. PubMed ID: 34605581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accommodation in emmetropic and myopic young adults wearing bifocal soft contact lenses.
    Tarrant J; Severson H; Wildsoet CF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 18201337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accommodation and Phoria in Children Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.
    Gong CR; Troilo D; Richdale K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Mar; 94(3):353-360. PubMed ID: 28027276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Allen PM; Charman WN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Sep; 48(9):4375-82. PubMed ID: 17724230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Binocular and accommodative function in the controlled randomized clinical trial MiSight® Assessment Study Spain (MASS).
    Ruiz-Pomeda A; Pérez-Sánchez B; Cañadas P; Prieto-Garrido FL; Gutiérrez-Ortega R; Villa-Collar C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 257(1):207-215. PubMed ID: 30196481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of accommodation of myopees wearing spectacle lenses and contact lenses].
    Yoshihara M; Ishizaki S; Yoshida S; Todo K
    Kaiin Dayori Nihon Kontakuto Renzu Gakkai; 1969; 11(2):20-35. PubMed ID: 5815648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Near binocular visual function in young adult orthokeratology versus soft contact lens wearers.
    Gifford K; Gifford P; Hendicott PL; Schmid KL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Jun; 40(3):184-189. PubMed ID: 28215499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correcting progressive myopia with bifocal contact lenses with central zone for distant vision: changes in accommodation and axial length (a preliminary report).
    Avetisov SE; Myagkov AV; Egorova AV
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2019; 135(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 30830073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vision-related quality of life comparison for emmetropes, myopes after refractive surgery, and myopes wearing spectacles or contact lenses.
    Chen CY; Keeffe JE; Garoufalis P; Islam FM; Dirani M; Couper TA; Taylor HR; Baird PN
    J Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 23(8):752-9. PubMed ID: 17985794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of the accommodative response and facility with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control.
    Vera J; Redondo B; Galan T; Machado P; Molina R; Koulieris GA; Jiménez R
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2023 Feb; 46(1):101526. PubMed ID: 34674953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Optical Correction Method on the Magnitude and Variability of Accommodative Response: A Test-retest Study.
    Jiménez R; Redondo B; Davies LN; Vera J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Aug; 96(8):568-578. PubMed ID: 31343514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accommodative Behavior of Eyes Wearing Aspheric Single Vision Contact Lenses.
    Altoaimi BH; Almutairi MS; Kollbaum P; Bradley A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):971-980. PubMed ID: 28858004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Use of contact lenses in progressive myopia].
    Shapiro EI; Kivaev AA; Kazakevich BG
    Vestn Oftalmol; 1990; 106(5):30-3. PubMed ID: 2264224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in accommodation and behavioural performance with a contact lens for myopia management: A comparison between a dual-focus and a single-vision soft contact lens.
    Redondo B; Vera J; Molina R; Galán T; Machado P; Jiménez R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Jul; 42(4):753-761. PubMed ID: 35305040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effects of orthokeratology lenses on the magnitude of accommodative lag and accommodativeconvergence/accommodation].
    Ren Q; Yue H; Zhou Q
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Feb; 41(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 26932215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the Cavitron Autorefractor 7 with contact lenses and non contact lens wearing patients.
    Koetting RA; Akerman DH; Koetting RR
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):115-8. PubMed ID: 6841865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ocular motor triad with single vision contact lenses compared to spectacle lenses.
    Hunt OA; Wolffsohn JS; García-Resúa C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 Dec; 29(5):239-45. PubMed ID: 16978910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aberration control and vision training as an effective means of improving accommodation in individuals with myopia.
    Allen PM; Radhakrishnan H; Rae S; Calver RI; Theagarayan BP; Nelson P; Osuobeni E; Sailoganathan A; Price H; O'Leary DJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 50(11):5120-9. PubMed ID: 19643961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.