These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5965877)

  • 1. Simple reaction time and response sets.
    Moss SM
    Hum Factors; 1966 Jun; 8(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 5965877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The role of unconscious sets formed on the basis of the perception of concrete visual stimuli and of illusory representations in conscious cognitive activity].
    Kostandov EA; Kurova NS; Cheremushkin EA; Iakovenko IA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1998; 48(3):438-48. PubMed ID: 9700907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EFFECT OF STIMULUS VARIABLES ON CHOICE REACTION TIMES AND THRESHOLDS.
    KASWAN J; YOUNG S
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 May; 69():511-4. PubMed ID: 14285607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The formation of a set based on illusory representations and during the perception of concrete visual stimuli].
    Kostandov EA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1999; 25(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 10204289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alcohol dose effects on feedback-maintained simple reaction time.
    Sutton D; Burns J
    J Psychol; 1971 Jul; 78(2d Half):151-9. PubMed ID: 5570788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbal expectancy and probability in two-choice reaction time.
    Hinrichs JV; Craft JL
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Jun; 88(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 5090927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Knowledge of alternatives and perception of tachistoscopic stimuli.
    Gummerman K
    J Exp Psychol; 1970 Mar; 83(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 5480910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An explanation for differences between stop-watch and mechanical timing of races.
    Naatanen R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Feb; 28(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 5777978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dependence of stability of the visual cognitive set on motivation].
    Kostandov EA; Kurova NS; Cheremushkin EA; Iakovenko IA
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2001; 51(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 11550636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Spatial orientation of attention: results and theories].
    Possamaï CA
    Can J Psychol; 1986 Dec; 40(4):388-413. PubMed ID: 3332240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experimenter effects on the physiological experiment.
    Hicks RG
    Psychophysiology; 1970 Jul; 7(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 5492725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of psychic phenomena: a new light on health.
    Hankey A
    J Altern Complement Med; 2007 Oct; 13(8):787-8. PubMed ID: 17983332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why 2 + 2 = 5 looks so wrong: on the odd-even rule in sum verification.
    Krueger LE; Hallford EW
    Mem Cognit; 1984 Mar; 12(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 6727639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual response sets on the rod-and-frame task in a college sample.
    Hellkamp DT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Oct; 27(2):591-4. PubMed ID: 5701429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expectancy in educable subnormal children and their normal mental age controls.
    Folkard S
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Aug; 26(Pt3):495-502. PubMed ID: 4413355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
    Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of stimulus sequence and probability on perceptual processing.
    Hansen RS; Well AD
    Percept Psychophys; 1984 Feb; 35(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 6718210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional sets influence perceptual load effects, but not dilution effects.
    Benoni H; Zivony A; Tsal Y
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24131273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information processing through the first year of life: a longitudinal study using the visual expectation paradigm.
    Canfield RL; Smith EG; Brezsnyak MP; Snow KL
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1997; 62(2):1-145. PubMed ID: 9353949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of set, setting, and sedatives, on reaction time.
    Levine HD; Sicé J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):403-12. PubMed ID: 1272686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.