These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5966935)
1. Effects of display magnification, proprio- ceptive cues, control dynamics and trajectory characteristics on compensatory tracking performance. Smith RL; Garfinkle DR; Groth H; Lyman J Hum Factors; 1966 Oct; 8(5):427-34. PubMed ID: 5966935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative effects of display mode and input function on tracking performance. Christ RE; Newton RR J Exp Psychol; 1970 Aug; 85(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 5482025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Supplementary visual stimuli and rotary pursuit performance. Gordon NB; Warner A Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Dec; 27(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 5720382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. LEVEL OF DISPLAY INTEGRATION IN COMPENSATORY TRACKING. SAMPSON PB; ELKIN EH Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():59-62. PubMed ID: 14286557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A psychophysiological study of compensatory tracking on a digital display. Benson AJ; Huddleston JH; Rolfe JM Hum Factors; 1965 Oct; 7(5):457-72. PubMed ID: 5882207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Interaction of information displays with control system dynamics and course frequency in continuous tracking. OBERMAYER RW; SWARTZ WF; MUCKLER FA Percept Mot Skills; 1962 Aug; 15():199-215. PubMed ID: 14480989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Verbal coding and display coding in the acquisition and retention of tracking skill. Trumbo D; Ulrich L; Noble ME J Appl Psychol; 1965 Oct; 49(5):368-75. PubMed ID: 5828988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent effects of error magnification and field of view on compensatory tracking performance. Smith RL; Garfinkle DR; Lyman J Hum Factors; 1966 Dec; 8(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 5980855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Learning and performance as a function of the percentage of pursuit component in a tracking display. Briggs GE J Exp Psychol; 1966 Feb; 71(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 5903001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of nonlinearities on human operator tracking performance: a review of the literature. AMRL-TR-65-158. Wasicko RJ; Magdaleno RE AMRL TR; 1965 Sep; ():1-40. PubMed ID: 5321053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Searching for traffic signals while engaged in compensatory tracking. Noble M; Sanders AF Hum Factors; 1980 Feb; 22(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 7364449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of operator performance on a tracking task using discretely and continuously variable controls. Hammerton M; Tickner AH J Appl Psychol; 1968 Aug; 52(4):319-20. PubMed ID: 5665560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of kinesthetic-tactual and visual displays via a critical tracking task. Jagacinski RJ; Miller DP; Gilson RD Hum Factors; 1979 Feb; 21(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 468269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of stimulus preview and supplemental visual cues on children's spatial representation and perceptual-motor anticipation in a discrete tracking task. Davol SH; Quinn BA Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Oct; 35(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 5081293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Unidimensional compensatory tracking with a vibrotactile display. Hahn JF Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Dec; 21(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 5855904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Distance and location cues in short-term motor memory. Stelmach GE; Kelso JA Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 4747355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of contextual cues on the choice reaction time of mildly retarded adults. Brewer N; Nettelbeck T Am J Ment Defic; 1977 Jul; 82(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 883577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]