These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5970213)

  • 1. Simultaneous and successive contrast effects of reward magnitude in selective learning.
    Spear NE; Spitzner JH
    Psychol Monogr; 1966; 80(10):1-31. PubMed ID: 5970213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. THE EFFECT OF RATIO OF REINFORCEMENT ON PERFORMANCE IN SELECTIVE LEARNING BY CHILDREN.
    DAS JP; SAHU G; PANDA TP
    Br J Psychol; 1965 Aug; 56():289-94. PubMed ID: 14340126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance in differential conditioning as a function of variation in magnitude of reward.
    GOLDSTEIN H; SPENCE KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Jan; 65():86-93. PubMed ID: 13948805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percentage of reinforcement and reward magnitude effects in a T MAZE: between and within subjects.
    Spear NE; Pavlik WB
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):521-8. PubMed ID: 5909077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DELAY OF VERBAL REWARD IN VERBAL CONDITIONING AND SELECTIVE LEARNING.
    WEISS RF
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Jun; 16():857-61. PubMed ID: 14303017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. THE INFLUENCE OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD ON THE AVERSIVE PROPERTIES OF ANTICIPATORY FRUSTRATION.
    AMSEL A; SURRIDGE CT
    Can J Psychol; 1964 Dec; 18():321-7. PubMed ID: 14258395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. EFFECT OF STRENGTH OF DRIVE DETERMINED BY A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR APPETITIVE CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF RATS.
    DEBOLD RC; MILLER NE; JENSEN DD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Feb; 59():102-8. PubMed ID: 14282384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD.
    SEMLER IJ
    Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Combination of magnitude and delay of reinforcement in instrumental escape conditioning.
    Woods PJ; Feldman GB
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Aug; 62(1):149-51. PubMed ID: 5970381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. REPLICATION REPORT: ABSENCE OF A SUCCESSIVE CONTRAST EFFECT ON INSTRUMENTAL RUNNING BEHAVIOR AFTER A SHIFT IN SUCROSE CONCENTRATION.
    SPEAR NE
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Apr; 16():393-4. PubMed ID: 14285834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. RESPONSE FORCE AS A FUNCTION OF AMOUNT OF REINFORCEMENT.
    DILOLLO V; ENSMINGER WD; NOTTERMAN JM
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():27-31. PubMed ID: 14315127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A TEST OF THE RELATIVE-VALENCE THEORY OF INSTRUMENTAL-REWARD LEARNING.
    HEATHCOTE MJ; CHAMPION RA
    Am J Psychol; 1963 Dec; 76():679-82. PubMed ID: 14082666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. STRENGTH OF PREFERENCE FOR FOOD, MAGNITUDE OF FOOD REWARD, AND PERFORMANCE IN INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING.
    ALLISON J
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1964 Apr; 57():217-23. PubMed ID: 14168646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting discrimination learning from differential conditioning with amount of reinforcement as a variable.
    Champion RA; Smith LR
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Apr; 71(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 5909078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjustment to new reward: simultaneous- and successive-contrast effects.
    Spear NE; Hill WF
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Nov; 70(5):510-9. PubMed ID: 5833673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shifts in magnitude of reward and contrast effects in instrumental and selective learning: a reinterpretation.
    Black RW
    Psychol Rev; 1968 Mar; 75(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 4870549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task.
    Suri RE; Schultz W
    Neuroscience; 1999; 91(3):871-90. PubMed ID: 10391468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. RELATION BETWEEN STIMULUS INTENSITY AND OPERANT RESPONSE RATE AS A FUNCTION OF DISCRIMINATION TRAINING AND DRIVE.
    GRAY JA
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():9-24. PubMed ID: 14256256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A TEST OF A DISCRIMINATION HYPOTHESIS OF SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT.
    MYERS NA; MYERS JL
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jul; 70():98-101. PubMed ID: 14315138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of magnitude and percentage of reward on subsequent patterns of runway speed.
    Hill WF; Wallace WP
    J Exp Psychol; 1967 Apr; 73(4):544-8. PubMed ID: 6034008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.