These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5978931)

  • 1. [Errors resulting from faulty interpretation of electrocardiograms].
    Várkonyi G
    Orv Hetil; 1966 Nov; 107(47):2224-8. PubMed ID: 5978931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observations on the use of the aVR-V6 relationship to recognize limb lead error.
    Bennett KR; Bennett FT; Markov AK
    J Emerg Med; 2009 May; 36(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 18514467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-assisted interpretation of electro- and vectorcardiograms. Chapter IV. Achievements in the field of computer-assisted interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Brohet C
    Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt); 1980; 35(4):201-64. PubMed ID: 7015461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [ECG diagnosis: faulty positioning of electrodes in the coronary sinus].
    Immer FF; Berdat PA; Eigenmann V; Carrel TP
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Nov; 129(47):1849. PubMed ID: 10609288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Errors in the computerized electrocardiogram interpretation of cardiac rhythm.
    Shah AP; Rubin SA
    J Electrocardiol; 2007; 40(5):385-90. PubMed ID: 17531257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Automated analysis of electrocardiograms at rest: present status (author's transl)].
    Dragodanne C; Thomas D; Frank R; Grosgogeat Y; Hirel JC; Akoun JP
    Nouv Presse Med; 1981 Apr; 10(15):1211-4. PubMed ID: 7220293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis.
    Anh D; Krishnan S; Bogun F
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Will the electrocardiograph replace the electrocardiographer?
    Rautaharju PM
    J Electrocardiol; 1993; 26 Suppl():158-63. PubMed ID: 8189120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K; Kanda T; Osada M; Tsunoda Y; Kodajima N; Fukumura Y; Suzuki T; Kobayashi I
    J Med; 1999; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocardiograms with pacemakers: accuracy of computer reading.
    Guglin ME; Datwani N
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr; 40(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 16919672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-assisted interpretation of orthogonal electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms by the Louvain system.
    Brohet C; Derwael-Barchy C; Fesler R; Brasseur L
    Acta Cardiol Suppl; 1981; 26():19-28. PubMed ID: 6461152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common errors in computer electrocardiogram interpretation.
    Guglin ME; Thatai D
    Int J Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 106(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 16321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Is computed interpretation of electrocardiograms suitable for a general medicine department?].
    Besançon F; Cousteau JP; Bodiou C; Bodiou P
    Sem Hop; 1984 Feb; 60(9):618-20. PubMed ID: 6324369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recommendations for the interpretation and evaluation of electrocardiograms of juveniles and adults. A short programmed course. 3. Introduction and partial program I: Rhythm forms, heart rate and position type 3. Demonstration of selected electrocardiograms].
    Assmann I; Mücke D; Pries W; Werner G; Fiehring H; Bartel J
    Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1981 Nov; 75(22):1050-60. PubMed ID: 7340189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [How to manage all those ECGs? Experiences with computer-based storage and interpretation of electrocardiograms in the county of Vastmanland].
    Nilsson G; Walker A; Jonason T; Ringqvist I
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Oct; 98(44):4833-7. PubMed ID: 11729796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diabetic patients with myocardial infarction; the diagnostic accuracy of the electrocardiogram.
    RUBIN HB; WEISS MJ
    Calif Med; 1957 Apr; 86(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 13413695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misdiagnosis of atrial fibrillation and its clinical consequences.
    Bogun F; Anh D; Kalahasty G; Wissner E; Bou Serhal C; Bazzi R; Weaver WD; Schuger C
    Am J Med; 2004 Nov; 117(9):636-42. PubMed ID: 15501200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Current trends in the reading and interpretation of electrocardiograms].
    Menotti A
    Policlinico Prat; 1966 Sep; 73(36):1206-10. PubMed ID: 5991357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Uncertainties in the reading of electrocardiograms and the personal coefficient of interpretation].
    PESTEL M
    Presse Med (1893); 1958 Jun; 66(46):1044. PubMed ID: 13567514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified method of mass interpretation and processing electrocardiograms.
    LINDSAY LV
    Med Techn Bull; 1957; 8(6):259-61. PubMed ID: 13492826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.