These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5980204)

  • 1. The lippes loop. An intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Berger DL
    J Kans Med Soc; 1966 Dec; 67(12):591-2. PubMed ID: 5980204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?].
    Forrest JD
    Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative study of Hall's ring and Lippes' loop as intrauterine contraceptives].
    Bolio Arista R; Ruiz Moreno JA; Rubio Lotvin B
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1973 Aug; 28(202):123-8. PubMed ID: 4753786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of the effectiveness of the Lippes Loop, the Copper-T-200, and the Nova-T intrauterine contraceptive devices in Lagos, Nigeria.
    Oyediran MA; Akinla OA; Aderinola EA
    Int J Fertil; 1982; 27(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 6126444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Continuation rates of use with a closed, non-tailed intrauterine device: polygon (M) and Lippes' loop (B).
    Kashyap P; Sugathan TN
    Indian J Med Res; 1971 Apr; 59(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 5567103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Long-term use of the Lippes intrauterine device].
    Ruiz Moreno JA; Rubio Lotvin B
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Sep; 50(305):237-41. PubMed ID: 7186862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acceptability of the Lippes loop computed by life-table method.
    Gunaratne M
    Ceylon Med J; 1974 Dec; 19(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 4457243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of intrauterine devices on subsequent fertility.
    Skjeldestad FE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 20(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 18460943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pelvic inflammation and the intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Elstein M; Birnberg C; Mills W; Eckstein P
    Proc R Soc Med; 1967 Apr; 60(4):397-8. PubMed ID: 6067057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Postplacental application of 5 different types of intrauterine devices].
    Reynoso L; Arevalo N; Lara R; Aznar R
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 May; 50(301):107-10. PubMed ID: 7182224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experiment comparing the postabortal performance of the Lippes loop, Copper T, and Dalkon shield.
    Kwon HY; Ross JA
    Kajok Kyehoek Nonjip; 1974 Dec; 1():139-43. PubMed ID: 12178422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progress report on intrauterine devices.
    Tietze C
    Parivar Ayojan; 1968; 2():13-29. PubMed ID: 12338660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Simultaneous intrauterine and extrauterine pregnancy in the presence of inert intrauterine device: a case report].
    Akpadza K; Kotor KT; Baeta S; Hodonou AK
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1995; 90(7-9):360-1. PubMed ID: 7481441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ortho stops marketing Lippes Loop; cites economic factors.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1985 Nov; 6(11):149-52. PubMed ID: 12313949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pregnancy outcome in women with an intrauterine contraceptive device.
    Ganer H; Levy A; Ohel I; Sheiner E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 201(4):381.e1-5. PubMed ID: 19716537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of intrauterine devices preceded by measurement of the endometrial cavity using a Hollister sound].
    Reynoso Ron L; Lozano Balderas M; Lara Ricalde R; Flores Velez A; Aznar Ramos R
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1982 Feb; 50(298):21-4. PubMed ID: 7129181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative data on the effectiveness of using the intrauterine contraceptive, the Lippes loop].
    Harkusha IeF; Maksymov HP; Reĭners MM
    Pediatr Akus Ginekol; 1979; (4):59-60. PubMed ID: 514670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: a comparison between their use in indigent and private patients.
    Willson JR; Ledger WJ; Lowell J
    Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Jan; 29(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 6017946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrauterine devices.
    Mccarthy TG; Ratnam SS
    Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 12345158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice.
    Presley AP
    Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.