These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5982188)
1. [Methods of dosimetry for teletherapy]. Schoknecht G Rontgenpraxis; 1966 Sep; 19(9):238-48. PubMed ID: 5982188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The method of constructing diagrams of transverse body section for radioisotope teletherapy]. Kalinichenko MA Med Radiol (Mosk); 1969 Feb; 14(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 5369835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [BRIEF COMMENT ON CURRENT DOSIMETRY IN THE FIELD OF THERAPY WITH IONIZING RADIATIONS]. BIANCHI E; BACARINI L Friuli Med; 1964; 19():23-36. PubMed ID: 14175597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Film dosimetry of high-energy rays. V. Energy and phantom depth dependence of the film sensitivity for high-energy photon and electron rays during exposition parallel to the direction of incidence]. Rassow J; Strüter HD Strahlentherapie; 1971; 141(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 4996071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Determination of dosage distribution by computer in radiotherapy]. Becker J; Fehrentz D; Kuttig H Cesk Radiol; 1969 Feb; 23(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 5781257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A source of error in pelvic dosimetry. Ryall RD; Rapley LF S Afr Med J; 1969 Dec; 43(49):1493-5. PubMed ID: 5361333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetry in mannequins less than 25 cm in thickness (preliminary results for x-ray, cesium-137 and cobalt-60 apparatus)]. Légaré JM Strahlentherapie; 1966 Feb; 129(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 5988171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [A study of the dose field under a screen in gamma teletherapy]. Sarkisian IuKh Med Radiol (Mosk); 1967 Jul; 12(7):14-7. PubMed ID: 5603424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Dose distribution following wedge filter application in cesium 137 teletherapy]. Kuttig H; Lehnert D; Mai KE; Wieland C Strahlentherapie; 1969 Nov; 138(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 5364191 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Possible errors in the assessment of focal doses in teletherapy]. Lokshina AM; Novikova LV; Liass FM Med Radiol (Mosk); 1971 May; 16(5):16-22. PubMed ID: 5151720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [ON SOME DOSIMETRIC DEFINITIONS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE]. BISTOLFI F Radiol Med; 1964 May; 50():460-9. PubMed ID: 14168274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Criteria for estimation of radiation protection situation in the contact therapy and its application in GDR-overview]. Makedanz A Z Gesamte Hyg; 1970 Oct; 16(10):751-60. PubMed ID: 5516149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A simple graphic method for dose distribution determination in Ir192 wire implants. Erjavec M; Cevc P Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1966; 7(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 5955443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A convenient method of depth dose data representation for a 4 MeV linear accelerator. Mauderli W; Lorenz E; Fitzgerald LT Radiology; 1972 Sep; 104(3):685-8. PubMed ID: 5051486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Photographic dosimetry: construction of isodose curves]. Olivares MP; Plata A; Perez-Modrego S Acta Oncol (Madr); 1967; 6(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 5595685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [ON THE PREFERABILITY OF THE USE OF THE TISSUE HALF-VALUE LAYER (T.H.V.L.) RATHER THAN THE HALF-VALUE LAYER (H.V.L.) IN THE EVALUATION, FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, OF THE QUALITY OF RADIATION]. SIGHINOLFI R Radiobiol Radioter Fis Med; 1963; 18():381-91. PubMed ID: 14107400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]