These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 59872)
21. The Abortion Act, 1967, of the United Kingdom--an unsatisfactory law. Smithurst BA Med J Aust; 1969 Oct; 2(17):863-5. PubMed ID: 5352871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion and the NHS. Flint D Br Med J; 1979 Feb; 1(6162):555. PubMed ID: 444901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion and the NHS. Noble A Br Med J; 1979 Feb; 1(6162):554. PubMed ID: 444897 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Evidence of the Royal College of General Practitioners to the Select Committee of Parliament on the Abortion (Amendment) Bill. The Council of the Royal College of General Practitioners J R Coll Gen Pract; 1975 Oct; 25(159):774-6. PubMed ID: 1195240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Editorial: Attitudes to abortion. Br Med J; 1974 Apr; 2(5910):69-70. PubMed ID: 4824939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The Abortion Act (1967). Findings of an inquiry into the first year's working of the Act conducted by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Br Med J; 1970 May; 2(5708):529-35. PubMed ID: 5428720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. How do we judge the Abortion Act/ Reflections on the Lane Committee and the 1967 Abortion Act. Simms M Public Health; 1973 Jul; 87(5):155-64. PubMed ID: 4802498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]