These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 598854)

  • 1. Measurement of the adhesive strength of a gingival cell line to agar.
    Fletcher RD; Breitling SM; Adamiak JK; Williams ML
    In Vitro; 1977; 13(12):857-60. PubMed ID: 598854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro microtensile bond strength of four adhesives tested at the gingival and pulpal walls of Class II restorations.
    Purk JH; Healy M; Dusevich V; Glaros A; Eick JD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Oct; 137(10):1414-8. PubMed ID: 17012721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shear bond strengths of a selenium containing and a conventional light cured adhesive for orthodontic bonding.
    Machicek SL; McGrory KR; English JD; Stephens CR; Ellis RK; Colville CD; Powers JM; Ontiveros JC; Akyalcin S
    Tex Dent J; 2011 Dec; 128(12):1261-7. PubMed ID: 22375444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation into the use of an anaerobic adhesive with two commercially available orthodontic brackets.
    Ireland AJ; Sherriff M
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 16364423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of debonding characteristics of a new collapsible ceramic bracket.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Nov; 112(5):552-9. PubMed ID: 9387843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems incorporating an antibacterial monomer eugenyl methacrylate (EgMA) for endodontic restorations.
    Almaroof A; Niazi SA; Rojo L; Mannocci F; Deb S
    Dent Mater; 2017 May; 33(5):e239-e254. PubMed ID: 28245928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of bond strength between a conventional resin adhesive and a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Summers A; Kao E; Gilmore J; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug; 126(2):200-6; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative evaluation of cell attachment to glass, polystyrene, and fibronectin- or collagen-coated polystyrene by measurement of cell adhesive shear force and cell detachment energy.
    Yamamoto A; Mishima S; Maruyama N; Sumita M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 May; 50(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 10679674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs.
    Bishara SE; Olsen ME; VonWald L; Jakobsen JR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jul; 116(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 10393585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incorporation of bactericidal poly-acrylic acid modified copper iodide particles into adhesive resins.
    Sabatini C; Mennito AS; Wolf BJ; Pashley DH; Renné WG
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):546-55. PubMed ID: 25731156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical comparison of direct versus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives.
    Zachrisson BU; Brobakken BO
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Jul; 74(1):62-78. PubMed ID: 356618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cytotoxicity evaluation of three light-cured dentin adhesive materials on human gingival fibroblasts, ex vivo.
    Kierklo A; Pawińska M; Tokajuk G; Popławska B; Bielawska A
    Adv Med Sci; 2012; 57(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 23154426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An ex vivo investigation into the bond strength of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems.
    Sunna S; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1999 Mar; 26(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10333887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Function of laminins and laminin-binding integrins in gingival epithelial cell adhesion.
    Pakkala T; Virtanen I; Oksanen J; Jones JC; Hormia M
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jul; 73(7):709-19. PubMed ID: 12146529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonding resin thixotropy and viscosity influence on dentine bond strength.
    Niem T; Schmidt A; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():21-8. PubMed ID: 27234437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthodontic adhesives induce human gingival fibroblast toxicity and inflammation.
    Huang TH; Liao PH; Li HY; Ding SJ; Yen M; Kao CT
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):510-6. PubMed ID: 18416630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vitro technique for measuring cell adhesion to rigid materials.
    Fletcher RD; Schneider G; Labant M; Albertson JN
    J Dent Res; 1979 Jul; 58(7):1750-1. PubMed ID: 286724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of human gingival fibroblast interaction with dental implant abutment materials.
    Rutkunas V; Bukelskiene V; Sabaliauskas V; Balciunas E; Malinauskas M; Baltriukiene D
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Apr; 26(4):169. PubMed ID: 25804303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nanodiamond as promising material for bone tissue engineering.
    Grausova L; Bacakova L; Kromka A; Potocky S; Vanecek M; Nesladek M; Lisa V
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2009 Jun; 9(6):3524-34. PubMed ID: 19504878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.