These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5991948)
1. Presbyopia corrected with single vision spectacles or corneal lenses in preference to bifocal corneal lenses. Fonda G Trans Ophthalmol Soc Aust; 1966; 25():78-80. PubMed ID: 5991948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses. Callina T; Reynolds TP Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia]. Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Refraction and accommodation]. Tokoro T Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Feb; 111(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 17338323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers. Bachman WG J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of presbyopic vision corrections on nighttime driving performance. Chu BS; Wood JM; Collins MJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Sep; 51(9):4861-6. PubMed ID: 20375338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction of refractive errors: effect on accommodation and convergence. Sampson WG Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1971; 75(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 5550706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses. Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A definition of progressive power in ophthalmic lenses. Hubler RS J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Dec; 50(12):1361-3. PubMed ID: 521586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Advantages and disadvantages of contact lenses in the correction of ametropia]. Tomi A; Preda C; Nedelcu A; Goicea D Oftalmologia; 2005; 49(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 16245749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of refractive error and presbyopia in Timor-Leste. Ramke J; du Toit R; Palagyi A; Brian G; Naduvilath T Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jul; 91(7):860-6. PubMed ID: 17576709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore. Li L; Moody K; Tan DT; Yew KC; Ming PY; Long QB Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 19516144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The advantages and disadvantages of bifocal lenses]. Zanen A Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():71-8. PubMed ID: 9490160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Presbyopia--the last major challenge in ocular surgery]. Potop V Oftalmologia; 2008; 52(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 19065925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Optical correction for presbyopia patients using computer terminals]. Hermans G Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():107-11. PubMed ID: 9490148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]