These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5995431)
1. [Is an increase of obstetrical operations with the introduction of the vacuum extractor justified?]. Jalůvka V; Borkenhagen G Zentralbl Gynakol; 1966 Oct; 88(44):1501-8. PubMed ID: 5995431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Forceps-vacuum extractor. Comparative study. Personal experience]. López Cabal J; Ramírez Alonso F; Tapia Nava R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1969 Oct; 26(156):471-9. PubMed ID: 5385818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Clinical evaluation of the usefulness of vacuum extractor]. Kietlińska Z; Podsiadlowska W; Stelmachów J Wiad Lek; 1969 Nov; 22(22):2033-9. PubMed ID: 5367273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Perinatal problems and the role of the vacuum-extractor in the delivery department in a central hospital]. Rossavik IK Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1971 Jun; 91(18):1389-91. PubMed ID: 5568059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Forceps and vacuum extractor. A retrospective look at a 5-year period]. Aarseth P Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1970 Feb; 90(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 5426471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. THE VACUUM-EXTRACTOR. II. VALUE IN RELATION TO FORCEPS AND RANGE OF INDICATIONS. Lang P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1964; 43(S1):57-85. PubMed ID: 14150609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Forceps, vacuum suction and cesarean section from the point of view of the neonatologist]. Malaguzzi Valeri O; Ottaviano S Ann Ostet Ginecol Med Perinat; 1976; 97(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10602689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of maternal and fetal effects of vacuum extraction with forceps or cesarean deliveries. Greis JB; Bieniarz J; Scommegna A Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 57(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 7219906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Obstetrical vacuum-extractor and forceps. Indications and effects on the newborn infants]. Bonfadini Bossi E; Rella R; Fagnani D; Salini P; Console V; Onofri MP; Pezzoli G Minerva Ginecol; 1980 Apr; 32(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 7383439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of obstetric forceps in Finland today--experience at Vaasa Central Hospital 1984-1998. Gardberg M; Ahinko-Hakamaa K; Laakkonen E; Kivelä P Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):803-5. PubMed ID: 10535345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cesarean section. Use of the obstetrical vacuum extractor. Our experience]. Roncuzzi R Quad Clin Ostet Ginecol; 1968 Sep; 23(9):852-4. PubMed ID: 5745846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The mounting rate of cesarean sections. Is it accompanied by a drop in instrumental births? Gharaibeh AM; Al-Bdour AE; Akasheh HF Saudi Med J; 2008 Feb; 29(2):267-70. PubMed ID: 18246239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity. Shihadeh A; Al-Najdawi W East Mediterr Health J; 2001; 7(1-2):106-14. PubMed ID: 12596959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]