These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 600059)
1. Physician liability for adverse drug reactions. Carleton R Med Trial Tech Q; 1977; 24(2):184-96. PubMed ID: 600059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Package inserts, adverse drug reactions, and the physician's liability. Morrell MX Ration Drug Ther; 1975 Aug; 9(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 1144773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Liability for adverse drug reactions. Francisco CJ Tex Med; 1990 May; 86(5):42-6. PubMed ID: 2343420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians' liability for failure to anticipate and control reactions and interactions precipitated by prescribed or administered drugs. Junewicz JJ Leg Med Annu; 1977; 1976():327-49. PubMed ID: 865226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Birth control: the minor and the physician. McLeod MG Queens Law J; 1982; 5(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 11658274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rebirth of informed consent: a cultural analysis of the Informed Consent Doctrine after Schreiber v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin. Ketler SK Northwest Univ Law Rev; 2001; 95(3):1029-56. PubMed ID: 12778922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [To what extent is the physician responsible for adverse effects of drugs?]. Trube-Becker E Med Klin; 1980 Jun; 75(13):496-8. PubMed ID: 7412700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Must we forgo informed consent to control health care costs? A response to Mark A. Hall. Appelbaum PS Milbank Q; 1993; 71(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 11643184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana. Boland GL LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Enterprise liability for bad outcomes from drug therapy: the doctor, the hospital, the pharmacy, and the drug firm. Furrow BR Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1998 Apr; (229):9-69. PubMed ID: 10178162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Liability for drug damages]. Barnikel W Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1977 Jan; 102(4):139. PubMed ID: 832595 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The performance of invasive procedures by HIV-infected doctors: the duty to disclose under the informed consent doctrine. DeBarge MW Conn Law Rev; 1993; 25(3):991-1025. PubMed ID: 11659692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The doctor, the pharmacist, the patient, and the placebo, or you're not my mother, doctor. Nielsen JR Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Nov; 44(6):639-57. PubMed ID: 11659226 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent: defining limits through therapeutic parameters. Daar JF Whittier Law Rev; 1995; 16(1):187-209. PubMed ID: 11660487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic torts: the law of the future -- the duty of physicians to disclose the presence of a genetic disease to the relatives of their patients with the disease. Deftos LJ Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1997; 32(1):105-37. PubMed ID: 11660530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]